• doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    I mean, why is this a story in the first place? To me this just sounds like collateral in a very bloody war. Including children in the title is on purpose to make a point and fuel a debate.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      When did very bloody wars stop being newsworthy stories?

      When did children’s safety in war stop being newsworthy?

      And if there is a debate to be fuelled, how is “too many children are dying in this very bloody war” not a point of view that is worth making a point for?

      Are you even human?