• deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not.

      If you are, what do you have against warrants? If someone kidnapped your friend and kept them locked away in their house. Don’t you want there to be a way for the police to legally rescue your friend if they have evidence on where they are being held?

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        because warrant or not, no one should have the power to remotely turn on your camera/mic/etc without your knowledge and monitor it.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For me it’s mostly against judges. Like judges that decide that because the victim of a rape doesn’t remember the rape (because it was so horrible her brain blocked it out), the perpetrator should be free.

        Or those judges that decide that there’s not enough proof that a billionaire-owned chemical factory polluted a river that most of the fish died, even though there’s only one chemical factory on the river that could have done it.

        (Those both are local issues you probably haven’t heard of, though I believe you’ve probably heard about many such cases)

        Would you want any of those judges give a warrant to someone to spy on you?