• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Whelp, that’s barbaric.

    I was considering saying something about the law maybe being to restrictive, and that if people with vaginas want to have the procedure, they should be allowed to have it if they choose to, but in every other case, it’s banned, but the whole thing about the clit really turned me around on it.

    Cosmetic surgery to reduce the labia is a thing, and such surgery should be entirely voluntary for the individual it will affect, but just hacking and slashing to the point where it’s common to cut away the clit is just… No.

    Ban ban ban ban ban. I don’t even have a vagina and fuck that. It’s shameful enough that anyone performed that kind of mutilation, don’t backslide into ignorance by lifting the ban on it.

    • livus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The worst part is that by calling it “cutting off the clit” @SeaJ@lemm.ee is actually underselling how bad it is.

      FGM in The Gambia is mostly Type II which is when they cut off the clit and the labia minora (lips). Clit chopping is at the mild end, and at the severe end they chop everything off and sew it up leaving a small hole for pee.