In the few short hours since I started using #Threads, #DuckDuckGo has already blocked over 200 data tracking attempts. These include things like “headphone status” and “screen density.”

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People left Facebook because it got overwhelmed with their parents and grandparents, not because they ever cared about privacy.

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, literally everyone I know has a Facebook page. They may not use it, buts it’s there almost like a listing in a phone book.

          • mainaccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Happened to me. Had a fake profile to test some apps and when they asked for an ID, I literally sent a pic of my MIDDLE FINGER. They accepted.

            • morriscox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did you make sure to remove the EXIF metadata? It would be ironic if it has the image location coordinates in it.

              • zeppo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They can get your location to various degrees of precision just from your IP address.

            • Rocket@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              200 iq move by facebook, now they have the biometric reading from the nail on your middle finger

            • mrnomoniker@lemmy.studio
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seriously? I’ve never even given it an email I use, let alone phone number, where do they get off asking for ID?

              • kite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                He may also be an admin of a Facebook page. I was an admin for my job’s (an absolutely important to no one but our community company) page, and Facebook suddenly decided one day that I was a ‘high value person of interest’ , which made me a possible hacking target. The wanted all kinds of personal info, including a copy of my ID, to prove I wasn’t some hacker, or they would disable all my access. Fuck no I’m not giving you that, go ahead and disable me

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same here. I didn’t sign in for a few years, and next time I did, they demanded my drivers license. Why would I possibly send my ID to this shitty website? They way overestimate their importance.

        • eleitl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know not a single one who has that. My wife uses WhatsApp and Instagram though.

          • 👽🍻👽@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Has a lot to do with age demographics and the inability for Meta to allow a person to easily delete their page. Many if not most millennials have a Facebook page, but like myself, never use it and when asked if I have a Facebook, say no even though I technically have a one I don’t log in to.

            Anecdotally, most of the people I know over the age of 45 have a Facebook and use it regularly. I don’t know very many zoomers, but the few sub-30 year olds I do know, never even made a Facebook account, but do use Instagram.

            • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have one haven’t used it years. But don’t delete it because of friends but now reminds me I need to delete it like asap.

            • seang96@spgrn.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had a person that hated me in high school create a FB page that said I graduated from Harvard and worked at a gay bar with a picture she sneakily took like a creep. Idiots believed it was my FB page and asked why I wasn’t accepting their friend requests. Not sure if the page still exists, I had family ask to try and take it down but I don’t use Facebook to know if anything happened.

              • Polydextrous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well, what we learned from those tech whistleblowers was that, even those of us that never even made a FB account have a profile made of us from pictures and things people said about us on their fuckin FB accounts. This probably goes for those of us born before ‘95, but I would assume that practice is only heightened by data scraped from Android devices, the expanded access via Instagram, the leaps in tech, etc for those born after ‘95.

                So buckle up, folks. It’s all bad.

                • morriscox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They’re called shadow profiles. They were also using information from the contact information in your phonebook.

        • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I pretty much have to have some form of Meta account or else I’m considered “shady” by some people. I haven’t even logged in in years, but just saying the username is appaeently enough.

        • mrmanager@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The phone book was not a big tech corporation, which is why it was a suitable place to have your phone number.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was owned by a big tech corporation, Ma Bell. And then it got broken up and there were just a bunch of smaller monopolies printing phone books.

            • mrmanager@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didnt know that… thank you, stranger.

              Big tech monopolies involved in everything, im just tired of it.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                One of the advantages(?) of being old is you remember all the previous times corporations have fucked us over in various ways. The phone company monopoly which turned into mini-monopolies was just one more example unfortunately. At least that one’s over now.

                • Marxine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  In the current age we don’t even have to be that old to have been screwed by big corporations more than once. I guess anyone in their 20s would have by now gone through it at least thrice.

            • kobra@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So what you’re saying is decentralization killed the phone book so Meta is actually saving us!? /s

  • scottywh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I don’t understand is why people wound even want to use this app…

    What possible appeal could it have?

    • DrZaious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Using Threads knowing it’s a product of Zuck, is like voting for Trump in 2024 cause he wore a different style suit.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say that, but if he went out on stage in a pink sequins suit with assless chaps because it would somehow “own the libs”, a tragically high number of people would be all over that.

        • daanzel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remember kids; assless chaps don’t exist, it’s just chaps. If they had asses, they’d be pants!

          • RCKLSSBNDN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a member of the local #42069 Union of Chapless Chaps, I waggle my fingers and blow a raspberry in solidarity.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey, if a bloke happened to be a waist-down amputee, I’d say he’s an assless chap. They can exist.

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Proud Boys leader fucked a dildo to own the libs. So you’re not wrong.

          • ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh God I forgot about that lmao, what a fucking idiot. I wonder how many of his fellow Proud Boys tried it out too 🤣

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a lot of dumpster divers out there, too. According to an AP article Threads “has drawn tens of millions of users since launching this week”.

        That’s nuts. And depressing.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Okay so it’s basically Twitter, but with like… Facebook features…” Is literally a joke I have made about annoying app ideas people have when you tell them you’re a software developer.

      I have made this joke a few times, because it killed every time.

      I’m stunned. Out of material, and stunned.

      • RCKLSSBNDN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Had a dude tell me he wanted to ‘disrupt’ social media by creating a LinkedIn alternative that allowed posting videos.

        He just needed a couple ‘techies’ like me to get it off the ground.

        Haven’t heard from him in a while. I hope rehab worked out for him.

      • The dogspaw @midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your responsible for this you willed this evil into the world I cast you out to the sea and rocks below to you and your twitter with Facebook features

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d guess you have to like Twitter in the first place to understand the appeal. Some people like it, some don’t, but the Twitter format has been pretty popular over the years, and this comes at at time when Elron has been making twitter dramatically worse for anyone who doesn’t share his political views. Meta gives the appeal as “having a platform that is sanely run, that they believe that they can trust and rely upon for distribution”. At this point, even if I thought Elron was a great guy I sure wouldn’t invest much in building my twitter account as the future of the site seems shaky. Also though, on the other hand, who knows if this will be a success for Meta and whether they’ll still support it 3 years from now.

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do have a Twitter account but I almost never use it anymore because it has become such a cesspool…

        I just don’t think another copy of that cesspool run by a different asshole is likely to really be any more interesting than the original.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I deleted my twitter account from 2009 once it was apparent what a clusterfuck Elron was going to make it. I never really used it that much until a few years ago, but I started in 2020 as it was the platform with the most recent and close to real-time news on what was going on with the riots and stuff (I was in downtown Portland when the Floyd protests started). I found a few niche communities I enjoyed and liked some of the humor accounts, like Roz Chast or NYT Pitchbot. I thought it was cool to see posts from people like Sandra Boynton. Buy yeah, no way I’m being on there in the Musk era.

          I don’t have high hopes for Threads either, of course, considering I don’t like or use IG or FB and have very little respect for Meta as a company, and their weird-ass founder. The privacy concerns are horrifying - I will never install the app on my phone, so if there isn’t web access I will literally never even try it.

        • Salvo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did have an account, until the API changes made Twitteriffic unusable and all the people I follow left. Then I started using Reddit.

          Now I use Mastodon and Lemmy. I will not go back to using a Social network that does not have; A) an open API which allows my choice of third party apps. B) a way to migrate my data and content.

          The exceptions are Apple Messages (for family and close friends), SMS (for family and close friends who do t have iPhones) and Facebook under a fake name, sandboxed in FireFox Focus.

    • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if you don’t have Threads app installed. Meta is still a privacy threat for fediverse users. If there are fediverse instances that remain federated with Meta. And there are already millions of people who joined Threads in just a day.

      Ross Schulman, senior fellow for decentralization at digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that if Threads emerges as a massive player in the fediverse, there could be concerns about what he calls “social graph slurping." Meta will know who all of its users interact with and follow within Threads, and it will also be able to see who its users follow in the broader fediverse. And if Threads builds up anywhere near the reach of other Meta platforms, just this little slice of life would give the company a fairly expansive view of interactions beyond its borders.

      https://www.wired.com/story/meta-threads-privacy-decentralization/

    • TheSaneWriter@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not really sure, but then again I also didn’t really understand the point of Twitter, so I’m a bit biased.

        • ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I always say: Almost like Reddit, but instead of following topics, you follow idiots

          Edit: I should add that reddit is now down the drain, that’s why I’m here now, lol. Federated Internet for the win!

  • prowert@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did you download threads in the first place? Just scanned the app in exodus and the list of trackers is worse than all meta apps combined

    • ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps to inform us all? Recon style self infection and inflitration of the brainwashed megacorp corps.

    • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta is still a privacy threat for fediverse users, if there are fediverse instances that remain federated with Meta.

      Ross Schulman, senior fellow for decentralization at digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that if Threads emerges as a massive player in the fediverse, there could be concerns about what he calls “social graph slurping." Meta will know who all of its users interact with and follow within Threads, and it will also be able to see who its users follow in the broader fediverse. And if Threads builds up anywhere near the reach of other Meta platforms, just this little slice of life would give the company a fairly expansive view of interactions beyond its borders.

      https://www.wired.com/story/meta-threads-privacy-decentralization/

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Orientation? Why would Facebook need to know if my phone is gay? Jk, I know they really want to know my phone’s political orientation. Joke’s on them, my phone voted for Megatron.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the name of Vectron I bring you greetings, ambassador. May the power of Vectron bring prosperity unto your house.

  • loz@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago
    • The name of your first crush.
    • Your religious beliefs.
    • Your innermost fears.
    • That thing you did in June of 2007 that you must never speak about.
    • MrFlamey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You just reminded me of the random surveys that used to sometimes come in the mail for my Mum back before the internet was a thing. I flipped through a couple and it asked things like if you have a pet and what brand of cat food you gave them and all this totally random shit. I wonder what benefit to the home owner there was for filling such a bullshit survey in.

      These days, Facebook would probably just use some AI to scan your photos and figure out if you have a cat and what brand of food it eats. You’d never know, and you gave away any defence the moment you uploaded the image.

      • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve recently started taking a lot of international flights for work.

        Now the ad algorithms thinks I’m some international jet setter and I get ads for luxury boats.

    • cinda@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i get that these are jokes, but doesn’t the app store description literally include religious orientation in the list?

  • WhiteWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s unbelievable that an app which collect this many data points, including voice, is legally allowed. Insane. Yes, people should not use it and should care, but come on… this is just mass surveillance and collection.

    • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, that’s how Cambridge Analytica scandal happened

      Ross Schulman, senior fellow for decentralization at digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that if Threads emerges as a massive player in the fediverse, there could be concerns about what he calls “social graph slurping." Meta will know who all of its users interact with and follow within Threads, and it will also be able to see who its users follow in the broader fediverse. And if Threads builds up anywhere near the reach of other Meta platforms, just this little slice of life would give the company a fairly expansive view of interactions beyond its borders.

      https://www.wired.com/story/meta-threads-privacy-decentralization/

    • Nioxic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      including voice

      how else would facebook live and such work?

      i mean some of these makes sense

      but its also a question of … does the app use all these things, all the time?

      do we know?

      On my mac i have to allow discord to record my voice etc. if i dont, i can still use the app but i cant talk in a voice call, and such.

      i’d like if apps did similar, on phones. they’d work but some functions would just be unavailable

      • Lemon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A year ago or so when I wanted to check what Facebook had on me, so I requested my data. The document I got from them also included what apps I used at what times. I don’t mean Facebook apps, I saw at what times I used apps such as Discord and countless other apps I have on my phone.

        I am guessing Google has given Facebook special permissions to access more features and data on user devices without prompting too. An average app developer has to ask for each and every permission, but Facebook can afford to pay Google for some questionable deals regarding privacy.

        • sv1sjp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually, apps can check how many times other apps have been opened without any special permission. You can create a Work Profile with applications like Shelter and install all of these spyware there!

      • squidman64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        i’d like if apps did similar, on phones. they’d work but some functions would just be unavailable

        Both Android and iPhones let you do this last I checked

    • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta is a threat to the privacy of fediverse users, if there are fediverse instances that remain federated with Meta.

      Ross Schulman, senior fellow for decentralization at digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that if Threads emerges as a massive player in the fediverse, there could be concerns about what he calls “social graph slurping." Meta will know who all of its users interact with and follow within Threads, and it will also be able to see who its users follow in the broader fediverse. And if Threads builds up anywhere near the reach of other Meta platforms, just this little slice of life would give the company a fairly expansive view of interactions beyond its borders.

      https://www.wired.com/story/meta-threads-privacy-decentralization/

    • Sterben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You got a good point. I minimized my usege of Facebook to the minimum maximum.

  • armrods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People here complaining about Threads and TikTok (Chinese owned) being the defacto social network for an entire generation over there without outrage, and when it’s outrage about it people just say “at least is not the US” what kind of defense is that?

      • armrods@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Post complaining about Meta collecting too much data from its users but Tiktok which has much more users than Threads and almost the same as FB doesnt get the same amount of complains, and when it does people shrugged off saying “at least is not owned by an US company” implying some would rather give their data to a chinese company.

    • AapoL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I usually don’t like these types of comments but here we go: Because in TikTok america bad memes are really popular. And TikTok is owned by the Chinese. What a coincidence.I don’t understand how TikTok is being defended here, its basically propaganda.Wasn’t there a case of like a huuge amount of videos critizising the chinese goverment removed?

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        “America bad” is a popular genre in literally every social network, just not in 'murican bubbles. It’s almost like the entire world hates the US about as much as China.

        • AapoL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty fair point but I just feel like its turned up to 11. The amount of memes about 911 and other stereotypical stuff on my friends feed is not comparable to other sosial media.

  • nickel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking at the data collection categories in the ios app store for Threads is terrifying. Similarly, mastodon collects nothing. General population doesn’t seem to care though given the number of signups that Threads has received in the last few days. People are happy to give their information away.