Just this guy, you know?

  • 0 Posts
  • 73 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle







  • Random turbulence that maims the flight crew just wouldn’t be practical as a “thing that just happens” on regular longhaul flights.

    I never said it happens often but it absolutely does happen. Here was a particularly spectacular example that happened to folks a few years back on their way to Australia (and note, if you want more examples, the article lists a couple of other past incidents that also resulted in crew and passenger injuries):

    https://apnews.com/article/49db2788d04d4e11bcbb1a63dbae4199

    Passengers on a flight from Canada to Australia said they had no warning about turbulence that suddenly slammed people into the ceiling of the plane and injured more than three dozen — a phenomenon that experts say can be nearly impossible for pilots to see coming.

    One passenger on that flight noted:

    “The plane just dropped,” passenger Stephanie Beam said. “When we hit turbulence, I woke up and looked over to make sure my kids were buckled. The next thing I knew there’s just literally bodies on the ceiling of the plane.”

    So again, I cannot emphasize this enough: wear your damn seatbelts, people.







  • zaphod@lemmy.catolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldOld is stability
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yes I’m aware of the security tradeoffs with testing, which is why I’ve started refraining from mentioning it as an option as pedants like to pop out of the woodwork and mention this exact issue every damn time.

    Also, testing absolutely gets “security support”, the issue is that security fixes don’t land in testing immediately and so there can be some delay. As per the FAQ:

    Security for testing benefits from the security efforts of the entire project for unstable. However, there is a minimum two-day migration delay, and sometimes security fixes can be held up by transitions. The Security Team helps to move along those transitions holding back important security uploads, but this is not always possible and delays may occur.



  • zaphod@lemmy.catolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldOld is stability
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    For the target users of Debian stable? No.

    Debian stable is for servers or other applications where security and predictability are paramount. For that application I absolutely do not want a lot package churn. Quite the opposite.

    Meanwhile Sid provides a rolling release experience that in practice is every bit as stable as any other rolling release distro.

    And if I have something running stable and I really need to pull in the latest of something, I can always mix and match.

    What makes Debian unique is that it offers a spectrum of options for different use cases and then lets me choose.

    If you don’t want that, fine, don’t use Debian. But for a lot of us, we choose Debian because of how it’s managed, not in spite of it.