![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
>see headline
“Oh cool. What fun and inventive thing is Microsoft doing?”
>reads first line of article
“Oh it’s for AI. Gross.”
>see headline
“Oh cool. What fun and inventive thing is Microsoft doing?”
>reads first line of article
“Oh it’s for AI. Gross.”
The economics aren’t there. A cellular chip and a subscription will not pay for the private conversations of a random house.
That’s 50x smaller than an EV battery. Being able to drive once every two months doesn’t seem practical.
There is 1.4E21 kg of water on Earth. 0.03% of hydrogen is deuterium, a suitable fusion fuel. H2O has an atomic mass of 18 and O has an atomic mass of 16, so Earth has 4.7E16 kg of deuterium readily centrifuged out of ocean water.
D-D fusion converts about 0.1% of mass to energy (4 MeV / c^2 / 4 Daltons). E=mc^2. So we have 4.2E30 (420E28) Joules of fusion fuel ready for us on Earth. We used 2400 TWh of energy last year. If we used this amount indefinitely then we would have 485 billion years of fuel.
Bonus: deuterium depletion would have virtually no environmental effect.
Jeez and I feel like I’m tempting fate just by using a custom domain.
TrueNAS Scale has a built-in cloud backup tool that supports the common sites and protocols. Most all NAS solutions have something similar. It’s really just an rsync wrapper with authentication and storage protocol support.
NAS + cloud backup is the way to go. Any NAS software worth its salt can do E2EE backup with any old cloud backup solution.
Definitely not for the faint of heart though. If you don’t actively enjoy fiddling then there aren’t many good options. Maybe icloud if you trust Apple to not de-platform you.
I had good luck with B2 backblaze but recently switched to storj for E2EE backups without having encrypted filenames in the browser. Overall these solutions are slower and more expensive than typical cloud backups, but it’s well worth it to stick it to the man.
Edit: more expensive, not cheaper.
We have not spent a hundred billion dollars on fusion energy research collectively as a planet in the past 70 years of working on it. We do spent 10x that every year for the US defense budget.
Sure they can. Just give the $7500 credit to an EV worth its price.
The prospect of one entity maybe having a backdoor is much more secure than every entity for sure having read access.
If you use RCS or SMS, yeah. iMessage is E2EE.
I’d be surprised if they don’t start setting performance records soon. First plasma was a few weeks ago.
If waste heat becomes a problem then we have been wildly successful beyond our most optimistic hopes. Signs point to that future being an utter fantasy. It’s squarely in the “good problems” category. I wish we could just choose between another order of magnitude increase in industrial output and increasing the temperature of the planet by a few degrees
Watch me.
The same GrapheneOS kicked out of AOSP Alliance for being toxic and shady?
Absurd. My wife and I quote this all the time.
The UN Chief resigning as a result would be a show of power. Calling for it and not getting is a show of weakness.
It depends what you mean by support. They made the Steam Link for 3 years and have not made it for 5 years.