![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f031cb45-6fe3-4839-bef4-71a365fe2dc8.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d2e1ce0e-4bc8-48ba-8e8c-e0b6fcef159b.png)
How would you handle detangling a mistaken git merge of two branches to create the Tuvix branch? Kill that branch and clone down the originals or let them stay merged?
How would you handle detangling a mistaken git merge of two branches to create the Tuvix branch? Kill that branch and clone down the originals or let them stay merged?
deleted by creator
The dev is also very responsive if you reach out with any issues.
You might be interested in https://linkstack.org/
I can’t cite a source but I read once that the lawyers got involved and said Microsoft/Windows/some other term they have legal control of had to be the first word.
No concerns about the company management being corrupt and working against your interests, though?
Yeah the main lesson I’ve taken away from the last decade of cryptocurrency instability, NFTs, and things like algorithmically generated judicial sentencing guidelines that perpetuated the existing racial biases while making them seem more legitimate because “the computer can’t be wrong” is that we should run our whole society with them.
I’m not in disagreement regarding moving away from disposable goods, especially plastic based ones. Just trying to point out the problem isn’t as cut and dry as you suggested. Straws are popular partly because they are more accessible so any solution that involves getting rid of them should take that need into account.
Straws are an accessibility need for some humans, not everyone is actually physically capable of drinking directly from a cup.
Misunderstanding on my end then, I made some clearly unfair assumptions. I agree with you there and apologize for the mischaracterization.
You might want to turn that incredibly critical eye you’ve got for communism back in on capitalism, that’s all.
Out of curiosity, how do you think governments in large capitalist economies (such as the US) properly account for greed for power and keep it in check? Do you think they are doing a good job on that front?
There is a world of difference between taking issue with someone making a poorly received argument and a government deciding that making that argument is inherently illegal.