What makes Servo a better bet than Ladybird? Who backs it?
What makes Servo a better bet than Ladybird? Who backs it?
Since people keep bringing up tauri, here’s the comparison made in the README:
Tauri is a framework for building desktop (and soon, mobile) apps where your frontend is written in a web-based framework like React, Vue, Svelte, etc. Whenever you need to do native work, you can write Rust functions and call them from your frontend.
Natively Rust: Tauri’s architecture limits your UI to either JavaScript or WebAssembly. With Dioxus, your Rust code is running natively on the user’s machine, letting you do things like spawning threads, accessing the filesystem, without any IPC bridge. This drastically simplifies your app’s architecture and makes it easier to build. You can build a Tauri app with Dioxus-Web as a frontend if you’d like.
Different scopes: Tauri needs to support JavaScript and its complex build tooling, limiting the scope of what you can do with it. Since Dioxus is exclusively focused on Rust, we’re able to provide extra utilities like Server Functions, advanced bundling, and a native renderer.
Shared DNA: While Tauri and Dioxus are separate projects, they do share libraries like Tao and Wry: windowing and webview libraries maintained by the Tauri team.
deleted by creator
C is a pretty simple language and relatively easy to learn. But it’s a lot harder to be proficient with.
Can’t they just use JSDoc?
By the same argument, wouldn’t GPL and other copyleft licenses be considered non-free as well since you are not free to do whatever you want with the source? For example, incorporating it into a proprietary project, refusing to provide the source to users upon request, or not disclosing attribution, etc. The latter would even go against the terms of permissive licenses.
Clearly defining what free, and by extension FOSS, means is very relevant.
It seems that no lua is packaged with pandoc-cli (By looking at the package contents of https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/pandoc-cli/)
So if I were you I would first try the AUR and see if there’s any package there that does.
Yeah I don’t want to be a nuisance to my office neighbours. Right now I’m using a logitech mx keys, I could try looking for an ansi version of that.
I will probably order a keychron with low profile switches for my home setup, so I depending on how quiet it is I might get that for work as well.
I want to try ANSI also, but it seems pretty hard to find in EU. I’ve considered getting a keychron for my gaming setup but I don’t want a full on mechanical for work, and I don’t want to use ISO at work and ANSI at home because it will screw with my muscle memory.
So just anti-censorship
That would be similar to saying you are assuming the user has opened the gui application, not just randomly clicking the desktop.
Of course I’m assuming they already know what application they want to use before exploring its capabilities.
$ command -h
$ command --help
$ man command
I have a lot of tab completions installed, too, so i can also just hit tab to get a list of all possible options, etc.
𝕏 (U+1D54F) and/or 𝕩 (U+1D569)
If you search blackboard bold or double-struck letters you can find more.
There’s definitively more to a distro than the shell prompt and wallpaper.
Besides the obvious package repos and how well package interoperability is maintained, there’s also differences for default configuration. OpenSUSE offers sane options for security OOtB, IMO.
Then there’s also linux itself. Some distros build the default kernel package with a set of patches to improve typical usability, while others just ship an untouched upstream version. Some offer alternatives while others don’t.
More bloat from flatpak overhead :^)
That’s not what they, or the stats, said. You can use chatgpt without plagiarizing, just like how you can use wikipedia without copy-pasting the whole article.
without explicit consent
Couldn’t they just add another ToS checkbox to click when installing the game?
Interesting! I used arch for about 2 years on my gaming rig and it worked fine but I was worried if he went with something based on Arch that he would eventually run into issues due to not properly maintaining it (avoiding partial upgrades for example). But I’m probably overthinking it. If he sticks to a GUI for installing and updating packages and avoid messing with the terminal initially it should be fine.
I will add EndeavourOS to a small list of recommendations (rolling vs point release) so he can decide for himself.
What distro did you go with? My friend is showing intrest in trying Linux but I’m not sure what to recommend him. I use more advanced distros myself but I want it to work well for him OOtB while also not requiring any tinkering. I’m think of either some ubuntu-flavour or fork, like Kubuntu or maybe Mint.
I used vscode for a few years, but I eventually went back to neovim/tmux. It’s a lot less resource heavy, and it’s easy to just ssh and jump in from home. I also much prefer a modal editor and I don’t want to have to touch a mouse.