If you can’t hold a small plastic bottle by the neck, you’ve got bigger problems than tethered caps.
If you can’t hold a small plastic bottle by the neck, you’ve got bigger problems than tethered caps.
They are also remarkably light on littering, so it doesn’t make sense for them to use cap tethers for litter prevention either.
Y’know how you hold the bottle with your hand to lift it? Believe it or not, you can hold it by the neck, and even slightly touching the little plastic ring the cap is tethered to will keep it from spinning.
Came here to post the exact same thing, happy to see you had it covered
Ehhh, kinda. Intel E-cores kinda throw off the balance a bit, but generally yeah.
So first of all, you shouldn’t involve yourself in your friend’s business. Fraud is generally frowned upon.
But secondly, you know that ChatGPT was trained on the entire internet, right? Like, every book. I don’t think “more books” is gonna help.
I hope you take your computer skills and make something of yourself. Try not to get any more involved in this scheme, seriously. You don’t need this crap marring your reputation.
Besides, there are better reasons/ways to fight the system than helping other people avoid learning.
Just that they’re no easier to use to fool an anti-AI system than using ChatGPT, Gemini, Bing, or Claude. Those AI detectors also give false positives on works made by humans. They’re unreliable in the first place.
Basically, they’re “boring text detectors” more than anything else.
I believe commercial LLMs have some kind of watermark when you apply AI for grammar and fixing in general, so I just need an AI to make these works undetectable with a private LLM.
That’s not how it works, sorry.
Quantized with more parameters is generally better than floating point with fewer parameters. If you can squeeze a 14b parameter model down to a 4-bit int quantization it’ll still generally outperform a 16-bit Floating Point 7b parameter equivalent.
No, I was genuinely guessing at what you were getting at, since you were alluding to one particular unnamed nation that relies heavily on slave labor. IDK if you opened that article, but it’s from last month and is a major report by the AP, so US slave labor’s been on my mind because I read the news.
You then seemingly got annoyed at my guess and decided it was some sort of debate. I pointed out why my guess was reasonable and now you’re trying to take a victory lap because I apparently annoyed you by not being a goddamn mind reader.
Seriously, you’re acting like I’m the one with the attitude here and all I’ve done is reflect yours back to you in one comment because you acted like I don’t know what slavery is. But I’m the one being an asshole?
Hard to say for certain, per a recent AP report, privacy laws protect the info of which private companies specifically are using prison labor at any given time in several states.
Seriously though, check out that article. Wild.
Have you read the 13th amendment? Prisoners in the US are legally allowed to be used for slave labor. That’s what I thought you were referencing
… the US?
Or vote farther left in the primaries, dragging the dems left kicking and screaming
IMO, if you want the beast deals right now on a 12+ TB HDD, you should use serverpartdeals.com instead. I’ve got 2 manufacturer recertified 14 TB enterprise-grade drives from them and it was way cheaper than buying any 14 TB external drive.
I’m not sure the US has the greatest track record when it comes to those sorts of occupational wars, realistically. I think the only times we’ve ever really seen it turn out well is maybe in vietnam, where we actively just like, lost the entire war and got sent packing, and they’re still having to deal with the ongoing problem of their country being contaminated by chemical incendiary weapons that produce larger percentages of birth defects.
Not disputing anything you said about Vietnam, but we did alright with Japan and South Korea.
Fortunately our sun isn’t big enough to go supernova. It’d just go nova. But also, the iron in a few thousand people’s blood probably isn’t enough to get down to the center of the sun within the timescale humans are likely to exist on.
I just read this as a “not” joke. As in, “yeah that was the fastest ever CO2 increase in earth’s history. Not”
Lunar eclipses have a range they’re visible from just like solar eclipses do, but they tend to be much larger since it depends only on if the side of the moon being eclipsed is visible from a given location at the time
The person you’re replying to linked their literal reliability stats lmao