Because the next best would probably be Icey McIceFace
Because the next best would probably be Icey McIceFace
I would have it no other way. I am the same. 😂
IBM 486 was my first PC as a kid. Throw in those floppys and game on DOS!
Got it. Wasn’t sure which is why I put that.
If you’re on iOS, every browser is basically a reskinned Safari. They all have to use WebKit
Sure, I saw that side of it too as I work in marketing but I took the comment at face value since it wasn’t specific about that intent. I’m happy to retract my comment if that’s what they meant.
That’s just not true. Many people engage with things they don’t like because of education and curiosity.
For instance, I don’t like your comment but I still engaged with it to point out that you’re wrong. I like Lemmy, in general, though.
But your argument, from what I read, is that they fawned over him because he made money. You’re specifically calling out the business/monetary side:
a capitalist world fawning over capitalists
No, they fawned over him because they liked his character and persona in public.
Fingerprinting.
Bingo! Google wants to go cookieless and fingerprinting has been one of the solves I’ve always read about in the SEO world.
Yeah, I figure as much. It’s really just a “we don’t want to” because those on the other team want to. There is no reason other than being the opposition…because.
But…why?
“Amid unprecedented global challenges, escalating energy prices and rising carbon costs, we are concerned about the timing of this ambitious climate target,” the document said.
Ok? So why? Because it’s expensive? Is that what this answer means? Or is it because they don’t think they can hit the goal since resources are harder to get? Or they just don’t want to and are making excuses?
I still don’t see why a green agenda is something we (meaning humanity) shouldn’t support.
Here you are thinking it was the device when it was actually the robot that malfunctioned over the period and then lost battery.
Dammit, no matter how you slice it, this joke is a cut above.
Big stone is increasing carbon into the air and it doesn’t care!
/s
Yeah, but in typical c-suite fashion they (e.g., Biden in this case) listen but don’t hear or care what the people who are actually in the shit of it all think/say because agendas.
Oh, just Clooney? If it was the Baldwins then there would be HELL to pay!
Yes.
From an American point of view:
If successful on their people, they’ll be using it on social to make up bullshit with “proof” that fuels MAGA rhetoric and make the divide in America even worse. The difference is that now when we ask for proof of these lies then they will have something that is pretty tangible to all but those who really know how to spot it.
They could even do it on the flip side and make horrible videos of Republicans saying things that they didn’t to make the left hate them even more and even if they said they didn’t do it we wouldn’t believe them because they’ve done and said horrible stuff already.
Scary shit!
Great question! Search engines crawl social media and discover links. It can be a sign of trust and authority if it’s shared widely, which can help boost signals of page importance to Google (or other engines) and help with pushing up in organic ranking positions.
Harmonizing brand details (name, address, phone number, website link) across all social platforms is important so you don’t send mixed signals or lead to unneeded redirects.
There’s also figuring out what page(s) you want to ensure are showcased if multiple URL links are allowed or maybe your social team doesn’t know all of the page assets you have to satisfy their audience, such as an orphaned page. These are part of what are called “backlinks”.
Hashtags do matter for some platforms and knowing how to research them for intent is wise.
There’s also open graph (OG) metadata that you can set on a webpage that allows your metadata to be different on social platforms than you would use for a search engine - tailor to your audience!
Edit: one other thing is, while not social media, maybe connecting with a social team (if there is one) to find out if any posts need to be applied to Google Business listings via a Google Post for local locations.
Yes they were free. There are back channels to people, dude. You should read about the history of SEO.
I’m not saying SEOs are responsible for accessibility, I’m saying they help others provide it! Like the mom and pop places I mentioned. You only asked for what good SEOs do and I provided examples. You’re so angry that you are projecting ideas that I didn’t say.
Every fucking thing you have mentioned is literally not SEO but some other stakeholder that has control of how everything works. SEO is just a means to make sure your company is the one that gets the visibility and a click because all other companies made it that way.
And the guy you quoted, Rand Fishkin, is one of the many SEOs that have been calling Google out on their bullshit for YEARS now. We know Google is shit but they are the elephant in the room and are the lexicon used as a verb worldwide.
Your fight isn’t with SEOs, it’s with the companies that gatekeep everything else and change the rules so everyone has to adapt. I’m done arguing. Your responses are Boolean with a true or false as long as it fits your narrative and you refuse to believe that there is any good in SEO. That’s fine and you’re welcome to your opinion.
That one too. Yours is better.