• 5 Posts
  • 85 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • The article via Google translate:

    The Minister of Human Rights and Citizenship, Silvio Almeida, cited the case of suicide of a young woman who was the target of fake news to defend the accountability of both those who spread false content and the companies responsible for social networks. “The regulation of social networks becomes a civilizing imperative”, he stated this Saturday (23).

    Minas Gerais student Jéssica Canedo, 22, appeared in false conversations with comedian Whindersson Nunes, publicized by gossip profiles on social networks, which reported that the two had a relationship.

    Before she died, Jéssica published a text stating that, because of fake news, she was suffering attacks on the internet. Her family reported that she already suffered from depression.

    “Tragedies like this involve mental health issues, without a doubt, but also, and perhaps to a greater extent, issues of a political nature”, wrote Silvio Almeida on his profile on X (formerly Twitter).

    “The irresponsibility of the companies that govern social networks in the face of content that other irresponsible and even criminals (some involved in institutional politics) propagate on it has destroyed families and made a minimally healthy social life impossible”, continued the minister.

     "Therefore, I return to the point: the regulation of social networks becomes a civilizing imperative, without which there is no talk of democracy or even dignity. The rest is a bet on chaos, death and the monetization of suffering" , he concluded.
    

    Also on X, the Minister of Women, Cida Gonçalves, said that the student’s death is “the result of the irresponsibility of profiles on social networks that profit from misogyny and the dissemination of lies and, equally, the lack of accountability on the platforms”.

     "It is unacceptable that the lying content against Jéssica, which led to a defamation campaign against the young woman, was not taken down by either the owner of the page or platform X for almost a week, even after appeals from Jéssica herself and his mother", declared Cida.
    

    Bill

    Silvio Almeida also republished on

    “Changing the liability regime for digital platforms is a political and even moral imperative that Congress must face. PL 2630 YES!”, says the message.

    “The responsibilities [in Jéssica’s case] need to be determined and the authors identified and punished. It’s not a left or right debate, it’s about civilization! The big issue needs to be resolved: platforms are not neutral, algorithms they reward the extreme, the grotesque, the destructive, the aberrant, the chaotic. And this is paid for! There are people profiting from the degeneration of society”, wrote the parliamentarian.

    Understand the case

     At the beginning of the week, gossip profiles shared fake screenshots of a conversation between Jéssica and Whindersson.
     The fake messages involved supposed flirting on Instagram, culminating in a request for a personal meeting.
     Both, however, denied the authenticity of the messages, claiming they were fake news, and stated that they did not know each other.
     The student then published a long message on her Instagram account, revealing that she was suffering attacks. She explicitly asked for the deletion of posts containing fake screenshots.
     One of those responsible for the Choquei profile, who wrote about the case, even made a joke about Enem's writing, in response to Jéssica's publication, and then deleted it.
     Family members reported the student’s death; Whindersson and Choquei's legal advisors spoke (see notes below).
    

    Read the note published by the Choquei profile:

    "We deeply regret what happened and we sympathize with the family and everyone affected by the sad event. We reinforce our commitment to act with diligence and responsibility.

    The profile Choquei (@choquei), through its legal advice, would like to clarify to its followers and friends that there was no irregularity in the dissemination of the information provided by this profile. It should be clarified that there is no responsibility to be attributed for the acts carried out, given the action in good faith and regular compliance with the proposed activities.

    In relation to the events circulating on social media and which were associated with a tragic event involving the young Jéssica Vitória Canedo, we want to emphasize that all publications were made based on data available at the time and in strict compliance with the usual activities arising from the exercise of right to information.

    This profile’s commitment has always been and will be to legality, responsibility and ethics in the dissemination of information within the limits established in the Federal Constitution, especially in art. 5th, item IX.

    Finally, we reaffirm our respect for intimacy, privacy, well-being and integrity.

    São Paulo-SP, December 23, 2023.









  • despite me explaining it over and over again.

    I keep telling myself it’s useless, they refuse to understand.

    … then I keep trying … T_T … in vain (15+ years of trying)… but then I try again. I just want to feel understood. I long for the family connection they’ve told me is so important my whole life .

    I have bent my words over backwards and reworded them in every way possible. I’ve used articles, videos, and infographics. I have made dozens of analogies and comparisons to their own lives. I have handed them literal scripts of things they could say. I’ve ve tried everything I’ve heard of so far to try and get my family to understand me. It very much feels like I am solidly in a box to them because I see them be understanding to others, to their own family, but never receive the same compassion.

    I resonate with this quote:

    “Once everyone sees you as a villain, that’s what you are. They only see you one way, no matter how hard you try.”- Nimona





  • This is my parents.

    Showing them they defend every single critique… is a critique. I’ve emphasized in so many ways how what they did wasn’t a big deal, how I’m not mad, how it’s ok and it’s a nothing-burger. I’ve given them literal scripts of what they could say. I’ve sent articles, videos, infographics that could help them understand and ways to be able to accept that what they did was a mistake an that it won’t make them a pariah. Telling them dozens of examples of times when I or anyone else has made a mistake and then apologized and fixed it when it was pointed out and everything was fine… nothing.

    They don’t change. Like you said, the critique is the problem, it’s not the problem that’s the problem to them.

    Just own it, make it right, and let some time heal any embarrassment that’s felt.

    Just had to vent.