What an astute and elaborate explanation. Surely this is this answer and the guy you responded to is definitely over simplifying it.
So why did we have to get everybody vaccinated? The boomer remover could have solved so many problems.
You really want to open it up to everyone?
They been talking to Dory?
Maybe you can help this make sense for me, as no one else has. We all know the government has proven to be corrupt, regardless of which party is in charge. We also know that Big Pharma is corrupt as hell too. Their goal is to keep us sick because healthy people don’t buy medicine. Now all of a sudden when they both say “Here take this shot otherwise you’ll kill grandma” we’re supposed to believe they have our best interest in mind? Like, why now? Why am I supposed to trust that what they say is safe and effective is actually that? I mean, drugs that have been used and studied for decades have been pulled of the shelf because it turns out it does more harm than good. It’s also been proven that the covid vaccine isn’t nearly as effective that they were touting.
Wait, so we like guns now?
You’re overthinking it. You didn’t say anything insensitive or stupid. It will offend some people, but they are usually looking at how to be a victim and that gives them an opportunity. It’s just words, don’t worry about it so much.
I don’t think that’s making the point you think it is.
Eh, just curious to see what the fuss was all about. Forgive me, I think I made the artist $.00000005
Oh, I don’t. I’ll protect myself. Where I live the police are about fifteen minutes away. Ain’t nobody got time for that.
You don’t need a gun. Just call the police. They’ll take care of you.
OK, and? That music just isn’t on my radar, therefore the algorithm never suggests it to me. What’s your point?
That’s the end of the thought process. It doesn’t need to be removed, it just needs to be removed from their line of sight. As long as they don’t know about it, it doesn’t exist. Problem solved.
They should thank you all for the free advertisement. I had no idea this was a thing until this thread.
Capitalism isn’t the problem. It’s corruption. So rather than fix the problem and hold the corrupt individuals accountable, you’d rather stop the symptom. But then the source of the problem is still there and manifests itself elsewhere. But it’s easy just putting bandaids on things, so I can see why that would be the crux of your efforts.
No one is stopping you. Go for it!
What’s the threshold of income that would meet your criteria? Do you normally base jail time off of someone’s income, legally or illegally?
Why is the proposed solution always to just pay people more and not just make things cost less? The only reason I can find is that making things cost less doesn’t provide a scapegoat for everybody to rally behind, even though it would be more effective.