Yes true. The billions and billions we sent them in aid was no help. We have never helped them. Somehow they kept themselves fed and taken care of.

That’s cool. Reality is quite credible though.

I think they should have stopped while they were ahead.

When reality is some kind of elaborate trivial argument. I don’t spin anything I literally point out what has factually happened in reality since 1947. Of course they tell a sob story as they face the consequences of their own actions. Even through it all they still support Hamas. 80% think Hamas did nothing wrong October 7th. So why shouldn’t we victim blame? Will they accept peace? Doubt it. If they want war so damn much then that’s their problem why is it mine?

80% of them even dislike America according to this 2014 paper. Their biggest financial backer. Y’know the one who provided food and medicine to their exponentially growing population all while our own country faced our own crazy ass problems somehow we found the money to provide them aid. And 3 of every 4 of them dislike us. Okay lol. I’m suppose to feel sorry or something?

Same with you. When they attack it’s “yeah but the overblown atrocities they’ve faced over the decades” “look what they’ve done to them over the decades”

Meanwhile in reality land Israel housed, fed, provided medicine allowing their population to grow from 500k to 5.5M. They let them continue after Palestine launched a full blown invasion to destroy Israel from the world in 1948. Even after losing they let them prosper all these decades.

Removed by mod

They could have accepted that two state partition plan back in '47. Instead they launched a war on Israel months later trying to remove it from the map. They don’t want peace. They won’t take a two state solution. 80% of them currently support and agree with what happened October 7th. They currently support Hamas, just like they supported them when they voted for Hamas which ran on “we are going to destroy Israel.”

This past few decades they have been housed, fed, their population exponentiallly grew and continues to grow from 500k in '47 to currently 5.5 million. But no yeah, evidence of apartheid and trauma and whatever lala land fairytale they sell you.

Ohh no. Did they fail to raise an army and go to war?

Anyways let’s debunk this crap. There was no Palestine in 1946 Palestine before 1946 was Arabs. The green in 1946 represents a million arabs living there and the white represents half a million Jews. Your map leaves out the British mandate land given to those Arabs of that time. That land known as Jordan today with 70% Arab Palestine descent.

Your last map is pure bullshit. Their population has swelled in numbers since 1946 from 100k population to 5 millions? Yet it portrays an ethnic cleansing? Riiiiiight.

Your 2nd map was the two state proposal offered in 1947 which the Arabs declined and proceeded to try and destroy Israel off the map in 1948.

Your third map is the consequences of them wanting to destroy Israel imo but whatever something something atrocities something something no partition plan no Israel.

what are the implications?

My last 2 comments. 😉😉

We’ve gone from doing medical blood tests in woman boxing to who cares they die anyways let them die and beg for it first. And you still ask what I’m talking about lmao.

Oh yeah, atrocities we committed on them. Supporting their exponential population growth. All the aid we send them. 60% of their population children? And growing.

Damn. We really committed atrocities toward them. How dare we send them billions and billions in aid. They fucked and fucked and partied so hard from such horrendous atrocities.

Can you believe 80% of Palestinians currently support the October 7th attack as well as support hamas even after all this shit? It’s mind boggling how they had it all and here they are. They choose to do and support this crap.

Me personally I’m going to stick with number of deaths as reported by the gaza government. Which has been proven over this past decade to have accurate numbers through multiple mass-casualty events.

Not conservative estimates or whatever crap the Lancet is trying to push.

Yes it is the estimate it lead to. They said they were being very conservative with that number and it could even be as much as 15x higher.

The Gaza health ministry has always been accurate in their numbers.

I don’t think you should speculate so much.

You joke and speculate but the Gaza health ministry numbers have always been reliable.

When journalists and peer-review get a more accurate number of deaths than… The Gaza health ministry ran by the government of Gaza.

Okay.

I said it before. Why don’t we just say 500 thousand dead why be so conservative? Why don’t we even say it’s a million dead!

You seriously just joked about how they count the casualties. That’s wicked work.

My number comes from the way we get to that “30-whatever thousand number”

Why don’t we just say 500 thousand died in this case or even 1 million?

These people have banks and bills there are ways to gather more accurate numbers than guessing. And yes every body found is counted and attempted to be verified by hospital morgues. Dumb****. Don’t make jokes.

Yes it makes the 10% number wrong when you attempt to claim a genocide is happening.

You and Lancet seem to use a “Gaza strip population” to inflate the number and make it look higher than it is. My number comes from the total population of Palestine people of both Gaza and West Bank.

The number of verified deaths should be relevant. It seems disrespectful not to. Every speculated death should be verified. I’m sure there is a way to verify.

It is possible for the Lancet to be biased in one way or another yes. It is possible sure. There have been credible orgs who have questioned this Lancet estimate.

It’s not definitely wrong. It’s the number of verified deaths. Speculation is speculation. Also 186,000 dead would be 4% of the population.

Where does the 10% number come from? It’s less than 1.5% and it includes Hamas terrorists as well.