![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Oh, I guess I was assuming it wasn’t even sharp, like an actual novelty item.
Oh, I guess I was assuming it wasn’t even sharp, like an actual novelty item.
Not really, stuff like this doesn’t keep coming up because it’s a one time thing. This is multiple units, in multiple locations, at multiple times.
Prison? For this?
Just take it away and warn him. How did no one along the way protest the heavy handedness of this?
Good because there’s two right there.
How many examples of using a human shield would you like?
I’m guessing it’s whatever there’s evidence for, and then one more. After all you’re down to nitpicking the subcategories of human shields.
TIL, thanks!
So you’re volunteering to go looking for explosives without drones, weapons, or any other equipment normally given to EOD soldiers? The idea that this footage is normal is ridiculous to anyone whose spent even a second in a western military.
I get what you’re saying but I think they’re trying to say anyone who would do this isn’t a real Jew. In the same way we try to disavow Christians who are punishing the poor and homeless.
Oh look more Credible Evidence of war crimes. And we’re just going to ignore it like everything else.
Real journalists manage to do their jobs just fine in Western countries. Even the YouTubers. He clearly crossed the line.
I’m not going to write an entire paper on the differences between journalists and spies to satisfy an Internet stranger. Organizations like the NYT act completely differently with their sources than Assange did. They release documents only after carefully checking for information that can put people in danger, and they never do something for the sole purpose of harming a country.
We know this law doesn’t apply to journalists because they tried to use it against them during the Cold War and the courts told them it wouldn’t fly. So all this hand wringing over civil rights is just concern trolling to defend someone who made themselves an enemy of the US by working with Russian intelligence agencies to interfere in our elections.
Edit to add - if you really want to claim our civil courts didn’t have jurisdiction we could always have let the military handle it. We certainly wouldn’t be watching him go home right now though.
Did they though? He cultivated a relation with a source in exchange for intelligence.
It does where they’re concerned.
I’ve seen it a few times related to war stuff. Looks like it’s mostly arts coverage though, kind of like Smithsonian magazine or something.
We won’t know until the tell all book is written in ten years.
Only if Chiquita actually failed miserably.
It really isn’t. There’s more video out there, just not as well corroborated.