deleted by creator

Depends on how long you live/often you buy a new one and what you pay for your watches now doesn’t it? 😉

Have you looked at the second hand market of used Rolex Watches vs First Generations of Smart Watches?

I’m not trying to put anyone down jut fact remains,you can flip the Rolex you buy on the second hand market and get money back after 10+ years.ä without any problems.

But the one with the Rolex logo will most likely retain it’s value over multiple years and might even increase.

Yours will probably be out of software updates and incompatible within a couple of years.

Horrible! I hope this doesn’t become a pretext for Russia to go after other countries.

I like that more and more websites have realized they are loosing traffic on denying ad blockers so that they offer the options to “disable and support” or “continue anyway”.

Traffic is king and people will find other sites if you try to be a hard ass about it.

Don’t fuck with Sweden!

As Johandea wrote it it’s a temporary “work around” that has been put in place during the time the case will be decided upon. The workers in question (union members within the postal services, and all others) are still on strike.

I have a hard time seeing that they will ever win over the unions in court and that the court will deem the strike illegal and force unions that are on strike to revoke it.

As said, (sorry but I miss wrote “protest”) the right to strike is defended by law.

Wow, good luck with trying to apply US tactics in Swedish society.

Suing will not get you anywhere except ridiculed.

The right to protest is protected by the equivalent of constitutional law.

But then on the other hand, you have “granted” yourself a “carte blanche” to exit the Swedish market afterwards.

“We did everything we could, we even sued the state but to no avail”

Meanwhile in Sweden, the National Board of Health and Welfare changed their guidelines in regards to drinking:

"Risky drinking now means drinking any of the following:

• 10 standard glasses or more per week.

• 4 standard glasses or more per drinking occasion (so-called intensive consumption) once a month or more often."

True story!

https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/kunskapsstod-och-regler/regler-och-riktlinjer/nationella-riktlinjer/riktlinjer-och-utvarderingar/levnadsvanor/

Google translate:

https://www-socialstyrelsen-se.translate.goog/kunskapsstod-och-regler/regler-och-riktlinjer/nationella-riktlinjer/riktlinjer-och-utvarderingar/levnadsvanor/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv&_x_tr_pto=wapp

No worries, I understand your input and it is valid but I THINK (please correct me if I am wrong here) this isn’t the case here.

If I block “sports@lemmy.world”, it is valid and fully understandable that I would still see posts from “sports@xdc.lemmy”. Or?

The reason that I realized I was seeing posts from blocked communities was because I opened a post and where going to block the community it was posted to when I was shown a “unblock community” option instead, the community was already blocked by me previously.

Ah, not a solution but an explanation and my expectations on the feature are reasonable.

Thanks for the input, probably an server issue then.

Precisely the same here gender wise!!

Screen time limits hasn’t been working for months, have had several support cases in regards to it, debugging and logs sent to Apple and nothing.

Second to last time they actually admitted to having problems with the function (accidentally I am sure since I can bet money on that they aren’t allowed to admitting to faults).

Have just given up on the function now