Hey get a load of this guy, can’t even expose one lousy US war crime. He’s basically complicit
Hey get a load of this guy, can’t even expose one lousy US war crime. He’s basically complicit
Scraped my car tire rim on a curb the other day and mashing Ctrl + Z in my brain for minutes afterwards :(
You’re forgetting one important thing - Bezos needs more money! Line must go up. Always. At any cost.
I was a long time subscriber as well, but canceled right before Christmas 2022. I missed it for about a week and then I realized most things I “needed immediately” from Amazon I could either 1) drive across town to purchase from brick and mortar or 2) actually just wait for it.
The end result has been me buying less things I don’t need, and buying the things I do need from local retailers (and of course big box stores), or ordering them from other online retailers since the shipping is comparable to Amazon.
2 years in and I don’t miss it at all, will never go back. I do want to watch the Fallout series though.
that’s what the gun is for, the bullets can outrun anyone, even an unarmed child
Removed by mod
Solely? No. But if the airbag, seatbelt, or self-driving autopilot feature that they created contributed to someone’s death, they are partially responsible and should face consequences or punishments. Especially if they market it as a safe feature.
Both can be nuts
Steve Jobs is the exception. I’m just trying to answer the original question about why this happens so often. I’m not trying to argue about the best way to run a company. But if you’re equating every founder with Steve Jobs then we’re having a completely different conversation.
Apple is now the most valuable company on earth, so I think you’re not making the point you think you’re making. Publicly traded companies act only based on what increases the value of their shares the most. If the current CEO isn’t seen as the most profitable CEO for the shareholders, they will eventually be replaced, even if they founded the company. That is a risk you knowingly take when taking your company public. Most founders choose the money that comes with an IPO, knowing they’ll eventually get the boot.
Because it requires a completely different skill set to run a startup with only yourself and 50 employees to worry about vs a multi-billion dollar, publicly traded company. People that are good at one of those often aren’t good at the other, so when their company changes from the former to the latter, they get the boot for someone better at running the new version of the company.
Wikipedia as an organization does this?? News to me so I’d love a source on that. I would not be surprised if people that work at Wikipedia donate to charitable causes or speak out about social issues, but that’s a very different thing called free speech
The first one that Google literally highlights, if you click it, it says that verbal contracts are binding but purchases of goods over $500 is an exception.
If you’re not talking about the first search result, maybe link to an actual source instead of the search results.
Cobain is risky, odds are he just peaces out again 😞
By making the free version worse, aka making the paid version more valuable
In a capitalist society you speak with your money. It’s the only language businesses speak. If you’re not giving a company any money they’re not going to cater their product to you, plain and simple.
Unfortunately you make less sense with every post. My life is going pretty well though thanks for caring, you’re a very kindhearted person.
Buddy you are so wrong lol, look at this screenshot and tell me what the comment at the very top says?
Oh look, it’s you hyperbolizing about people being forced to operate on someone who raped and murdered their family.
Then, as a CHILD COMMENT to yours, I make my very first comment in this thread.
Then you tell me I’m using hyperbole and try to discredit me.
Absolutely incredible the arrogance you have for someone that can’t even proof read your own arguments.
Hmmm let’s stay on topic. I didn’t say I support collective punishment of Palestine or anyone. I said missiles aren’t the same thing as border restrictions, because they clearly aren’t. Do you actually disagree?
I think it’s an honest question, which is a respectful thing to ask if you don’t know. I myself haven’t been sure, because I’ve heard it pronounced multiple different ways even by news pundits.