• Sarla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can tell that this audience is primarily American because they still defend capitalism, even after being shafted by it over and over. Careful everyone, big bad socialism is going to take your kids and your wife!

    Don’t dare dream of something better, instead keep swallowing the propaganda of the state and its controlling elites.

    • Fredselfish @lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man socialism keeps sounding better and better they will even take those pesky wife and kids off my hands/s.

      But in serious most Americans don’t know shit about socialism our capitalism they live under. Dumb fucks look at you with surprise when you mention our highway system would be considered socialist program.

        • Fredselfish @lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Roads and streets are funded 100% from taxs which make them a social program. I know not true 100% socialism but it’s as close as the United States will allow.

          Also most Americans always going on especially fucking Republicans and their voter base about how the government should be run like a business. But don’t realize the government should never be ran as one.

          The corruption already bad enough.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            which make them a social program. I know not true 100% socialism

            This is part of the problem of people not knowing what socialism even is. Even the ancient slavery systems could have social programs (for example famed Roman grain handouts in Rome), and the first modern, universal state funded social programs were introduced in 1889 in German Empire. neither of them was by any means socialist because socialism is not when the government does stuff.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s right, real freedom is being able to scream into the void without actually having the power to improve your material conditions. :)

    • Cfreeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why complain when capitalism ruins something that it created? Isn’t that how it works? Something else will come along and don’t better or differently and people will flock to it until it sucks too.

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey now, that’s unfair!

      As à Canadian, I can attest that we also blindly defend capitalism.

    • nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Communism does not have a good track record in places like Poland. After the absolute shithole that the PRL was, I dont kniw how you except people to defend communism.

      • shuzuko@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did they say communism? I don’t think they said communism. In fact, I’m pretty certain they said socialism, which is not the same thing unless you’re a propagandized American who licks boots.

        Communism is not the only alternative to capitalism, my dude.

    • fuklu@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends on what you mean by socialism. All systems have upsides and downsides. Late stage capitalism in the US has a lot of downsides, but workers taking over the means of production does not have a good track record.

    • Zyansheep@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I like capitalism. It is cool sometimes.

      (Comment gets downvoted to oblivion)

      Edit: would someone care to explain why there are no cases in which capitalism is cool?

      • lokoluis15@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s unsustainable and actively degenerates everything in its environment in pursuit of an insatiable need for capital growth.

        Saying capitalism isn’t that bad is like saying early stage cancer isn’t that bad. It doesn’t change the nature of the cancer and what it will become unabated.

      • Cynosure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most socialist states are better after their revolutions as opposed to before. The USSR went from a borderline feudal society to putting people in orbit in 50 years. Additionaly, socialist states outperform capitalist ones in similar wealth categories.

        • Silviecat44@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did they get to the moon? /s

          Anyway they aren’t around today without capitalism (modern russia) so your point is kind of useless

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you name a pure capitalist state that’s succeeded without socialist elements keeping it afloat?

        Follow-up: Why hand money to the leeches that do nothing but own shit rather than the workers that fuel the economy?

      • Cynosure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most socialist states are better after their revolutions as opposed to before. The USSR went from a borderline feudal society to putting people in orbit in 50 years. Additionaly, socialist states outperform capitalist ones in similar wealth categories.

  • lasagna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Goes without saying. Look at the profits of the companies providing essential resources like energy. They most certainly didn’t let a good crisis go to waste.

  • vibe@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or at least have them be publicly owned common good, owned by multiple countries with editorial independence from the get go and funded through taxation. That would be a start.

  • moosetwin@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Attention, people of Bikini Bottom! You have been cheated and lied to! The gentle laborer shall no longer suffer from the noxious greed of Mr. Krabs! We will dismantle oppression board by board! We’ll saw the foundation of big business in half, even if it takes an eternity! With your support, we will send the hammer of the people’s will crashing through Mr. Krabs’ HOUSE OF SERVITUDE!

  • mawkler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, it means that the users should own the services, which is what the F in FOSS means

  • onlinely@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, or at a bare minimum, CEO-proof everything and put more power in the hands of users of monolithic infrastructural utility products like Twitter, Facebook, Reddit

  • animist@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you say “workers” do you mean the actual workers or some vanguard party of intellectual champagne socialists who make decisions on the workers’ behalf?

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obviously they meant the former since that’s what we’re literally doing here. But even the latter would do a better job managing Twitter/Reddit than what they have now.

    • PorkRoll@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actual workers. If we made a society where people are taken care of, we’d find most folks would be enthusiastic about their work. Saying “people don’t want to work” is often taken at face value when the reality is that most people do want to work, because it helps them feel a sense of purpose. They don’t, however, want to be exploited/work under capitalism because that is soul crushing.

      • animist@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I agree completely with all of that. I just have been duped before by MLs saying worker ownership and what they really mean is their particular political party controlling everything. If everything is run by workers’ councils with no existence of a vanguard party, that would be paradise for me.

        I would also go beyond saying that labor (not “work,” as IMO the word “work” implies labor under capitalism) gives people a sense of purpose in that it gives communities a sense of purpose and connectedness. When we are all sharing in common labor toward the goal of enhancing our community and generally improving lives, we feel a more collectivized responsibility for one another.