• Syldon@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry, but Techreader agrees with me on this one. Apple Macbooks are simply not worth the money spent on them. Techreader does not mention the way Apple inhibits servicing or upgrades. A problem that does not exist at that level on the PC platform. Even with a laptop the CPU, memory and HDD are interchangeable. Apple does not want you to upgrade; they want you to spend 10X the cost by buying a whole new product.

      • Syldon@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because of the conversation thread.

        natebluehooves@pawb.social indicated that my opinion was out of touch. Since you say his opinion is based on current editions of Apple Macbooks, then my original statements still holds up that current Macbooks are a bad purchase all round.

        This is not a remark towards your input, and only that my opinion has not changed.

    • Fred Edwards 🔻@mastodon.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Syldon @1993_toyota_camry I bought a Macbook Pro in 2008 and used it happily (with little performance degradation) until 2018 when the displays logic board died and that vintage wasn’t being supplied any longer.

      I’ve honestly never heard of a PC laptop lasting 10 years like that, except maybe by grannies who put it in a cozy every night, just play solitaire on the thing and never heard of a Windows update.

      • Syldon@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, seriously my friend do not repeat that argument. OFC people use very old PCs. If you had a mac running for 10 years, this is not a regular event. The guy mentioned in this post, Louis Rossman, has made a lot of cash from pointing out the flaws behind the Macbook design. He makes a good living repairing them.

        The company I worked for had 286 PCs running the stock system all the way up till 2013. This is a PC that was running for 24 years before they considered replacing it. The company was not some back street mickey mouse set up who didn’t want to spend cash. This was one of the major car companies. Large companies do not change things that are critical to the operation without a lot of effort to makes sure it goes right. They rely heavily on old systems because they know they work. This is very much the case across a lot of large companies.

        • Fred Edwards 🔻@mastodon.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Syldon and I run a file server that’s now 16 years old, running Linux as happily as the day we bought it… of course, after it’s had its CPU, memory and hard drives upgraded multiple times. For 3 times the price of a Mac of the same vintage and no idea after the upgrades.

          I never meant to imply you couldn’t get quality PC gear, you very much can, but as soon as you do you’re paying just as much or more than a Mac.

          The PC vs Mac debate was old and tired in the 90s and now it’s just dead.

          • Syldon@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I never meant to imply you couldn’t get quality PC gear, you very much can, but as soon as you do you’re paying just as much or more than a Mac.

            I am guessing you think the internet is wrong then.