Why was it there in the first place I wonder?

  • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Conflating that with Europe’s scramble for Africa is disingenuous

    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/5/6/rich-countries-drained-152tn-from-the-global-south-since-1960

    For every dollar the global South receives in aid, fourteen dollars are extracted in unequal exchange alone. The Berlin Conference is one historical event. The historical process is still ongoing and the US has taken the lead role in that process. That process being the continuous dominance of the world by European powers. The English, Spanish, French, Dutch, Belgian, and Portuguese were all competing for the lead role in the process, Spain and England became the top two contenders, they met in the Americas with the French, and then the English settlers won the battle for control of the most land, resources, and people. Those settlers established the USA and took the lead role in the process.

    To claim that because the US was weaker at the exact time of the Berlin Conference is to distract from the historical process that the US benefits from and uses to extract trillions of dollars of wealth from the people they oppress as part of the continued oppression started by the Europeans during the Age of Discovery.

    China certainly isn’t working on their belt and road initiative because they think it’s a nice thing for the world.

    China’s theory of action is significantly different from the West’s. In the West, their theory of action is that dominance of the super majority of the world is in their self-interest, complete with extraction of hyperprofits from workers, mass murder, hard power projection, forced underdevelopment of the global South, and dumping all waste and externalities on the world’s majority. China’s theory of action is that a multi-polar world with far more even development and a focus on diplomacy, peace, autonomy of sovereign nations, and economic collaboration is in their self-interest. The BRI is absolutely in China’s self-interest, but it is not a Western imperialist project. Only the West thinks it is because the West projects all of its evils onto its opponents. The analysis has been done multiple times - China is not engaged in any debt trapping the way the West is.

    I still think African states turning to Russia/Wagner and China’s sphere are in for a rude awakening.

    I think you imagine that Russia/China are going to “do a Westy” on them. Think about what that says about the West. And when it doesn’t materialize, you can finally have that change of perspective you need.

    Realize that the US (and many other European states), as well as Taiwan, opposed the end of apartheid in South Africa while Cuba and China supported the end of apartheid. South Africa didn’t even officially recognize China until Hong Kong was returned from the British, because the economic and political ties the British imposed on South Africa and the rest of its territory were so critical to the functioning of SA that losing ties to Hong Kong was unthinkable, so they recognized China in order to keep trading with the British financial infrastructure that the colonial power had installed on the island.

    Nothing could be worse for Africa than what it suffered under the process of Western imperialism, including the historical period of US control of that process. 600 years of non-stop super exploitation, mass murder, subjugation, apartheid, indoctrination, forced underdevelopment, enslavement, environmental devastation, brutal collective punishment, systematized physical, psychological, and sexual torture… Whatever rude awakening you think they’ll get, it’ll be a dream compared to what the West did to it.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      China doesn’t engage in debt traps?

      https://apnews.com/article/china-debt-banking-loans-financial-developing-countries-collapse-8df6f9fac3e1e758d0e6d8d5dfbd3ed6

      Seems to me they’re doing it plenty and obfuscating as much as they can. State capitalism is still capitalism and they sure seem to have bought into the predatory loan part. But hey, like I said, they’re just working in their own self interest.

      If China could be the unipolar power of the world they would go for it. They talk about a multipolar future because it sounds nice while they strong arm all their neighbors over their imaginary nine dotted line. I don’t expect China and Russia to ‘do a westy’, they’re already doing their own brand of selfish foreign policy.

      I find it’s fascinating how you can harp on the west for their myriad of sins while ignoring Chinese state capitalism which extracts wealth in the same manner you criticize and Russian oligarchical kleptocracy just because the west sucks too. Both nations have imperial holdings, ask the Chechens or the Tibetans. At least I’m able to criticize my country’s bullshit without being locked up.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        China doesn’t engage in debt traps?

        Correct. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2021/02/china-debt-trap-diplomacy/617953/

        The Atlantic is well know for its hardline pro European propaganda and you can read their analysis.

        Seems to me they’re doing it plenty and obfuscating as much as they can.

        That’s what the West does, and the West is losing. China doesn’t want to lose like the West loses, so they are doing something different. Stop projecting.

        State capitalism is still capitalism

        This is not a useful analysis. State capitalism has different class characteristics.

        they sure seem to have bought into the predatory loan part.

        Stop projecting.

        like I said, they’re just working in their own self interest.

        Which is to not fail by following what the West has done.

        If China could be the unipolar power of the world they would go for it.

        Stop projecting. There is nothing in their writing, politics, rhetoric, or theory that would lead to this conclusion. The only way to come to this conclusion is to image that they are just as fucked up as Europe is but better at hiding it. This is silly.

        They talk about a multipolar future because it sounds nice while they strong arm all their neighbors over their imaginary nine dotted line. I don’t expect China and Russia to ‘do a westy’, they’re already doing their own brand of selfish foreign policy.

        False equivalency. Pushing the West out of the Pacific is not the same as the West invading the Pacific. This is the same argument that slaves killing their masters is just as violent, or worse, then masters dominating their slaves.

        I find it’s fascinating how you can harp on the west for their myriad of sins while ignoring Chinese state capitalism which extracts wealth in the same manner you criticize

        You wouldn’t find it fascinating if you actually studied the topic. Instead your are mystified that someone else doesn’t have the same propaganda-informed ignorance that you have. That’s not fascinating, it’s pedestrian. Raise your standards.

        Russian oligarchical kleptocracy

        Is terrible. It is still better for them to expand their sphere of influence for Western oligarchical kleptocracy to maintain it’s dominance over the world. Nothing has been worse for the world than the West.

        Both nations have imperial holdings, ask the Chechens or the Tibetans. At least I’m able to criticize my country’s bullshit without being locked up.

        The Tibetans who speak their native language from preschool through university? Why don’t you ask the Tibetans who live in Tibet whether they’d rather be in a Chinese autonomous region or in an Indian Reservation? The Tibetans are in far better shape than even most mainland Americans, let alone the people that the genocidal Europeans still dominate and destroy today. You know why you, personally, can criticize your country’s bullshit without being locked up? 1) your voice doesn’t matter, 2) you’re privileged. But that’s just you. There are plenty of political prisoners throughout white controlled lands, people who critique the government get locked up pretty regularly, or beaten, or assassinated. But because they’re black, or indigenous, you don’t remember them or even consider it the same thing. Meanwhile in China, there’s plenty of criticism happening all the time within the country and people don’t get locked up. It’s almost like there’s a nuanced position on the topic. What’s the net result of that nuance? China imprisons far less of its own people than the US does AND 95% of Chinese people approve of their government and that’s been true for all 15 years that Harvard has been conducting their immense study.

        You keep projecting to make yourself feel better. It doesn’t matter. The West will collapse under its own contradictions and China will not become the new West, because China knows that becoming the new West is the path to ruin. And the proof is here: we’re all watching the West slowly dying.