Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 7 months agoYouTubefile.coffeeimagemessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageYouTubefile.coffeeZerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 7 months agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareSinAdjetivos@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoIt’s wild to me that this is so often called “just business” when, described this way, it’s textbook racketeering.
minus-squareAndrasKrigare@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoCould you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”
minus-squareSinAdjetivos@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoThere’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”
minus-squareAndrasKrigare@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-27 months ago“The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain
minus-squareSinAdjetivos@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoBut it’s not free, just because you aren’t paying in money doesn’t mean you aren’t paying for it in other ways.
It’s wild to me that this is so often called “just business” when, described this way, it’s textbook racketeering.
Could you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”
There’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”
“The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain
But it’s not free, just because you aren’t paying in money doesn’t mean you aren’t paying for it in other ways.