Quite a controversial decision… I love Kagi though, but I don’t understand why they would want to drag Brave into this.

  • skeezix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You’re comment implied it’s a good privacy centric browser, which is wrong.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        That website is run by a Brave employee. And it skews its results in favor of any browser that happens to have an ad blocker.

        • Samueru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Who is the brave employee that runs it? privacytest is actually a open source test that you can run in your browser and has its own repo.

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Can you provide a source for the second sentence? After that, I can answer the first one.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Huh. You didn’t check out the About page that actually linked to the source code? Because if you had, you would have seen the author’s name and the statement of conflict of interest directly above the statement that it was open source…

                • Samueru@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  No I did not, I knew the website because I had used the tool before, not the other way around.

                  Thanks for letting me know about the conflict of interest, do you have any suggestions of a similar test?

        • Samueru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Alright what makes a browser good for privacy if fingerprinting does not count? (it does but I want to hear what you will say).

          • Asudox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            TL;DR: All chromium based browsers are shit. Switch to hardened firefox or librewolf

            I am not sure what you understand under fingerprinting (you literally can get the same fingerprinting protection by enabling the resistFingerprinting configuration in about:config in Firefox). Also fingerprinting protection, by ifself, isn’t enough to make a browser private. Plus I am not sure how anyone can even trust Brave’s browser when they are sketchy as fuck. Not only did they do creepy stuff like url injection, but also now have those weird ads and they are also into crypto which is not a good sign. I still fail to understand why people won’t appreciate Firefox browsers. The same functionality can be achieved if you spend literally like 5 minutes on it. Is it an issue with being lazy or just being not informed about it. Though I still do not recommend the stock firefox you can get from the official site. You’re better off installing something like Librewolf if you are someond that looks into “privacy” out of the box or hardened firefox with arkenfox’s user.js for the most privacy you probably can get without breaking literally every website you visit.

            • Samueru@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              All chromium based browsers are shit. Switch to hardened firefox or librewolf

              I’ve used firefox for years, in fact I sitll have librewolf on my PC with a custom userChrome.css, but the browsing experience is only getting worse every year and mozilla only breaks userChrome with every new update.

              I also mentioned librewolf in my original comment already.

              Plus I am not sure how anyone can even trust Brave’s browser when they are sketchy as fuck.

              They are open source lol

              The same functionality can be achieved if you spend literally like 5 minutes on it

              How do you sync your browser sessions without having to use an email? This is what mostly keeps me on brave.

              Also it really took me a while to get librewolf to block the cookie prompts from websites, because I had to go into the ublock origin settings and find the filter that blocks the cookie prompts, brave on the other hand does this automatically for you. As well as already having a built in dark mode, you don’t have to install 6 different extensions which is what I have on librewolf to get it to work.

              Also on linux firefox maps the alt+number keys to change tabs instead of using control+number keys, again on brave this comes by default, on firefox that is also another extension that needs to be added to fix that.

              In fact can you even change the background color of the new tab page in firefox? On brave it is super easy, it even lets you use an image, on librewolf I had to use a custom userContent.css for something so basic wtf.

              Also you didn’t go into details on what makes a browser good for privacy, brave can even block scripts if we are talking about going beyond the default settings, which on librewolf you have to use an extension as well to achive that.