![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
You are young and blissfully naive. Sec being included with development is a recent thing
You are young and blissfully naive. Sec being included with development is a recent thing
Good, fuck call centers. Make sure the societal benefit is captured via tax
Let’s see if any Lemmy users are able to correctly identify why this is happening. Bonus points for American-Style ignorance
Foreign policy
Oh please, another hapa with an identity crisis
Well he is a politician, so its fairly likely this is something politicial…
I’m surprised you genuinely believe this. Western sensibilities absolutely value this centrally.
I’ve no doubt that twitters banning system is a steaming pile, it has a long history of being terrible. Doesn’t change my point.
It literally says in the preview and the article it was restored quickly. There are a myriad of reasons she could have been banned.
I doubt Elon is sitting there with his dick out waiting to ban her, despite what most people here seem to believe?
You have drawn an incorrect conclusion about the specifics of the social mechanics and cited it as “from your experience” after presenting it as fact.
You could simply have a poor grasp of social mechanics, or be misinformed, misunderstood the original premise but ultimately it doesn’t really matter.
You implied lack of conformity and participation is not a cause of bullying - it absolutely is, its probably the original cause of most bullying.
You have completely misunderstood this and are trying to overlay some bizarre Andrew Tate-esque psychobabble to explain your misunderstanding.
You did the right thing. If it was the 1900s and everyone else was to give their child cigarettes, they might get bullied for having no cigarettes, but you know what is best and you stuck with it
Ubuntu server is fine relax
It’s always an interesting discussion when we raise the question of:
If people who are born with disabilities and intellectual impairments get special treatment, what is the threshold for being so stupid that you can’t be considered responsible for your actions (or be expected not to be manipulated or misled)?
There is a strong argument that people who aren’t that smart can’t really be held accountable for their actions, as its beyond their control.
This is ideal, but falls on a simple premise - everyone believes the other party is intolerant and that they are proudly righeous in behaving like a judge, jury and executioner.
Open and free critique means manipulation and grooming happens far less effectively, which neuters anything from its core. Society is the judge, but it must also be the metric it is measured against.
This is such a wonderfully ironic statement. It is through toleration that they are painted in a poor light.
Gen Z needs to understand the historical lesson that the Blues Brothers taught those before them. Illinois Nazis exist, and some days they demonstrate, as per their right to freedom of speech - but this is as much as an opportunity to humiliate them and openly critique the mindset as anyone else. Dark little underground communities flourish behind closed doors.
Is there a scraped list in text format somewhere?
Obesity is a bodily state based on inputs and outputs
Buy a mac or support steamOS adoption or just get a linux distro. This will drive the improvement of nontechnical consumer GNU/Linux