• Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Okay, I switched to Linux, now I’m getting this error message: _______.”

    “Install ______.”

    “It gives me this error now: ______.”

    “You have to update the _____ library first.”

    “It won’t let me.”

    “You have to use sudo.”

    “It tells me to clone the git via the command line, but git says verifying login from command line isn’t supported any more.”

    “You’re following seven year old instructions.”

    “They’re the only instructions I can find.”

    “You should switch to this other flavor of Linux.”

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Switch to Linux and spend way more time making sure everything is updated and having to jump through hoops installing things.

    • Dnn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      No idea what you mean. I just quickly wanted to update before calling it a night, got a grub update and now it neither boots the default nor the fallback image. I use Arch BTW.

    • somedaysoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is not a problem on any of the major distros, so I’m not sure what you’ve been using. Most distros have a GUI package manager that is awesome and you can update with just a few clicks. So what hoops are you jumping through, and how is this such a problem that it’s costing you time?

    • Whisper06@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I’m not sure the last time you used Linux but it’s nothing like that these days. As long as you stick with a well established distribution you’ll be fine. I haven’t had to go in a “fix” an update in a while, even in some of the beta updates they’re fairly stable.

      • Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, I’m not hating. I’ve had Linux before but it took more time then I had at that point learning and I mainly use my personal computers for gaming. Which is less of a headache on windows. That’s just me though.

        • Digester@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m on windows 10, use my PC for work and gaming. The thing with windows is that it works right out of the box, all major softwares are developed for windows in mind. When shit stops working is when you start messing with stuff that isn’t your typical “start the PC -> download program -> install -> run the program -> shut off” which is what most users do. Updating the os, softwares and GPU drivers are easy tasks.

          It’s when you start messing with python or softwares that aren’t too mainstream and require a bit more effort that things have the potential to break. Even then, the os itself won’t break on you unless you really try. I broke windows a few times in 15 years but it’s worth mentioning that I was manually and willingly changing registry keys and messing with a lot of other stuff. Even then most of the time I was able to fix it.

          With Linux is different. If you just use the OS for basic stuff like browsing the internet and editing documents you should be fine for the most part (if you choose a user friendly and stable distro like Ubuntu or Mint). The moment you try getting to run niche softwares or something that requires you to manually open the command prompt to change things in order to accomodate what you’re trying to achieve, that’s where it gets tough for most people. That’s how Linux works, it’s the user’s fault though not the machine’s.

        • transmatrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me, it’s the right OS for the job. I use Linux for servers, Windows for gaming/work, and MacOS for gaming/personal. However, Linux Gaming is definitely coming along partly thanks to Proton (Valve).

          • Holyginz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah that’s right I had heard something about that. Hopefully it continues improving so people don’t feel like they have to choose either Linux or gaming and can base it purely on which OS they like better.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can play the vast majority of games easily on Linux right now.

              I’ve been a gamer my whole life, and I currently have a Linux system and I play every game I want to play on there just fine, either through Steam and/or Bottles/Steam.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mostly just when you initially install like most OSes ; browsers, office suits, game launchers, etc… My mother doesn’t even notice fedora automatically installing updates when she turns her PC off. (I enabled automatic updates for her)

      Even with my arch Linux install with Hyprland, most of the time I just update before I turn it off. With a terminal command but even that is just paru and my password or flatpak update. If I had kde or gnome desktop, I could set it up to auto update too.

      Sometimes I don’t even bother and use the computer without updating it for a couple of months or it automatically updates when I install new software.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And brick your install when you want to use a package made for an older version of your distro. Got Debian 11? Good luck running that utility built for Debian 10! (or Ubuntu 22.04 and utility built for 18.04)

    • MrStetson@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t had this kind of problems with Fedora or Nobara, for me they just work. I’ve had more problems and used more time troubleshooting Windows than Linux

  • Stillhart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Okay, I’ll bite. I’ve been trying Linux every few years for the last few decades and it’s never been anywhere close to replacing Windows for me. I’m not a luddite; I was in tech for many years (MCSE certified) but there just… ALWAYS something that doesn’t work right. And there’s NEVER a simple fix. Linux for me ends up being more of a hobby than a tool and I haven’t had the time or patience to deal with it in the past.

    But I’m willing to try again,

    Anyone have any resources to get me pointed in the right direction? Which distro to try, how to install as a dual-boot on an exiting Windows machine without breaking it, how to get Steam/Nvidia drivers/games going, etc?

    EDIT - Apparently trying to dual boot with Windows on a machine with two physical drives is too much to ask (unless you have a CS degree). Maybe next time, Linux.

  • RCKLSSBNDN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember I had a date with a girl back in the’10s. We hit it off and got back to her place. Wanted to show her a funny Internet video.

    She brought out an ancient laptop that refused to boot and said her Ex had tried to fix it with Linux.

    I got it pointed at the right dependencies, she fellated me as it updated.

    I think this is my only sexy story that includes Linux.

    Well, I guess there was this one time I loaned a lonely neighbor DOS 6 disks.

    But, that does not include Linux.

  • vegantomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There are issues that simply cannot be resolved without switching away from Windows. For example inefficient drivers, old hardware, telemetry and privacy issues in general. I’ve several times seen how Linux can bring new life to old computers, make the PC cooler, and the fans spin less or not at all under low workloads.

    The primary instances where wouldn’t recommend Linux is when the person is:

    • Using DRM-heavy games that (on purpose) refuse to run on Wine/Proton.
    • Using Windows-only proprietary software or drivers.
    • Isn’t ready to learn a new system (e.g. an older or disabled person).

    If these issues don’t exist, I think Linux can bring benefit to a Windows user. If they are not ready to do a complete switch, they can dual-boot and try it out.

    • Rengoku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is, linux is not suitable for general crowd.

      How do you play Diablo 4 on Linux again? 4K while we’re at it?

      • Alatain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given that you need to install non-native hi rez textures to play Diablo 4 in 4k on Windows, that is not a good test for the “general crowd”.

        The moment you get into any kind of high end gaming PCs, you’ve already left “general crowd” territory for most computer users.

        • Rengoku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then lets scale down to suit the new narrative.

          How do normal users play diablo 4 linux in HD like install and play on Windows?

          • liara@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Install Lutris.

            Use the battle net install helper for Lutris.

            Launch battle net.

            Profit.

            It’s like one extra step (install Lutris) compared to Windows. Using Linux doesn’t have to be some archaic mystery and the proliferation of the steam deck is doing wonders at improving the ease of use of all this stuff.

          • Alatain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally, I don’t really mess with battlenet games at all, but my understanding is that you can open Lutris and install battlenet pretty easily. Then just like on Windows, you install Diablo via their installer, and for most people, it works out of the box.

            You can also download battlenet directly and add it as a non steam game to steam and then run it using their Proton compatibility option. This also works on the steam deck.

            Look, I’ll be the first one to say that gaming on Linux is not as easy as it can be on Windows. But it is definitely not a bad experience, and hard core gaming is not the majority use case for computers. We have billions of PC users in the world. Under 3 million play Diablo 4. That is a fraction of a fraction of a percent.

            • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, Heroic and Lutris arguably give a superior experience to inumerable windows installers…when they work. Which is pretty often.

              • Alatain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I feel like that is the common trend for me. Linux is the superior experience to Windows in every situation that it works at all.

                That includes when an issue arises. I would much prefer to troubleshoot a Linux install than Windows.

      • Gork@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My parents have a hard time clicking a download button and double clicking to install.

        There’s no way I can get them to apt-get anything from a command shell.

    • Cannacheques@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh I would probably only bother to use a Linux machine for a media server really, Windows isn’t going anywhere anytime soon, computer games, widespread office and engineering support, general purpose software support and the fact that everyone uses it is the big three reasons why it’s still around, just look at how well Android has managed to stick around.

      I think the only way for Linux to get ahead would be to offer easy potential alternatives to all these things, even then they’re only just competing

  • nyternic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who has had been around Linux-based people and whenever I have had a single gripe about Windows - it’s this.

    I don’t have a hate boner with Linux, I just feel like Linux is a little too much for the average casual user. Everything is fine until they run into a single issue with Linux, if the bewilderment of not having their familiar easy to run programs that they had on Windows wasn’t a turn off for them from the get-go.

    • InnKeeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would disagree with “average casual user” or maybe I think about them differently. For me average casual user now is completely fine with Linux distribution like Mint or Ubuntu or similar (or maybe chrome os). And with that they are little bit safer online as they are usual targets and victims of malicious software etc.

      I think casual users are type of people completely happy with internet browser, media player, image viewer and just basic software … They are usually satisfied with regular Android phone Wich is enough for everything they do in computer space.

      This type of users (like my mother and other members of family) are fine with major Linux distros. They don’t care about OS they use, it means nothing to them.

      This is where I draw the line when suggesting Linux to people. If they don’t know and don’t care …Linux is usually fine. If they are aware of what type of os they use or even what version ( talking about Windows) I will suggest Linux only if they are open to it and I’m willing to help and recommend some software alternatives.

  • Tekchip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows sucks but no one seems to realize this because they’re too comfortable with how they fix, or work around, the broken stuff repetitively. The repetitiveness of the bad experience becomes “normal” so nothing is amiss. It being broken is “normal” so in their eyes it "just works"TM. It’s almost like a form of brain washing.

    It really is akin to people in domestic abuse situations who are just so numb to it they aren’t motivated to get out.

    Maybe we should be taking a book from domestic abuse counseling or something?

  • ColPanic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, you don’t say “switch to Linux”. This is an opportunity to be free from the shackles of being the go-to IT support person! If they say they are having computer problems, ask “Is it Linux? No? Sorry, can’t help you”

    • Cannacheques@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my experience you wind up just hitting up YouTube or stack exchange or something similar for a tutorial on how to do something that could work out the box on a Windows machine

  • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    About the same when you ask for a good GUI replacement for X and someone replies “just use the command line”, like cheers for that men, not what I’m asking for.

    • littlecolt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      AMEN! I asked recently if there was a good Linux alternative to this program I used in Windows called “Bulk Rename Utility” and i was flooded by people telling me how easy it was to set up a script to do what I want.

      Turns out the best alternative is running BRU in Wine.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There almost always powerful existing utilities that can do what you want in linux.

        But you have to find them and they have a learning curve. Sometimes that “curve” is a cliff.

      • hellishharlot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This makes me wonder how powerful a repo platform like gitlab would be if it allowed people to suggest software ideas and have people make them. In this instance a simple GUI wrapper for bulk rename command line would be sufficient but I would bet there’s millions of things like that, not world changing software just nice qol stuff

      • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d have recommended KRename personally. It uses some programming-esque stuff (format specifiers for stuff), but it’s not exactly difficult to do advanced stuff with it.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I tried to do something very similar recently and every solution I found involved using the command line with regular expressions. Fuck I hate regex. It would literally be faster for me to manually rename the files than to debug the regex until it works.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still don’t understand why there isn’t a terminal-gui (you know, those text but graphical utilities) for basic stuff like mounting a network share. Why do I still need to manually edit fstab?!?

    • sucksatusernames@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Why even use a DE? Try a WM like openbox”

      Well, because a lot of things are simplified with DE functionality, and not everyone has the same preferences…

    • Whisper06@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do have to vouch for sometimes the command line is easier, not with everything but sometimes. Like my VPN sometimes it’s a little slow on the uptake and finding a server all that nonsense but I can also just have a few taps away at the command line and bing bang boom it’s done.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like wanting to hear “this is the Year of the Linux Desktop” and needing to hear “this is the 27th consecutive Year of the Linux Desktop that failed”?

          • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And yet people stay away from it in droves.

            Fancy that.

            Sounds like someone is hearing what he wants to hear, not what he needs to.

            • somedaysoon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And yet people stay away from it in droves.

              Ad Populum. I don’t consider the opinions of morons.

              Sounds like someone is hearing what he wants to hear, not what he needs to.

              Reaching now, huh? Swing and a miss.

  • Ddhuud@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That used to be me. Now whenever someone ask me to fix their computer I’m like “no hablo windowes”

  • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    A non-technical end-user once had a problem with Windows. A technical friend said “SWITCH TO LINUX”. Now they have thousands of problems.

    I’ve been a non-stop user of Linux as my primary OS since before Ubuntu was a thing. I do not recommend Linux systems to my non-technical friends.

    • Eugenia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as the distro is stable anyone can use it to use a browser and browse the internet. I had put Ubuntu Linux for my mom on a laptop, back in 2010, she was using just the browser. She had it for 2 years, no problems. She did nothing else with that laptop though, because that was the first time she was using a computer. She was mostly facebooking.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You gave Ubuntu to your grandmother and she fucking died?
        OMG, Linux kills grandmothers!

        (I know, I quit Windows around 95, it’s just that I couldn’t resist)

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t because I don’t wanna be that guy.

      But in general these days, I’d absolutely recommend it. Anything in the debian family is just as easy to use as windows. As long as you hook them up with some good cron jobs for auto updates and rollbacks on failures and stuff, they’ll be right as rain.

      To be clear, I wouldn’t have in like 2015.

    • Aggravationstation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My Aunt bought a new laptop to run her eBay/Facebook selling business on. She’s not particularly techy but has used Windows machines for admin work for prob 20 years or so. Laptop had no office apps installed and she tracks everything in a spreadsheet. Original plan was to install Libreoffice but it was running some budget version of Windows 10 you can’t install anything on, can’t remember what it’s called. So I installed Fedora. Chromium and Libreoffice Calc open on login, her ancient HP printer works, she’s able to access her camera as USB mass storage when she lists items and unattended upgrades are enabled. That was 2 years ago, no problems since.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool story, bro. And for every such cool story you can bring up I can bring you a hundred, probably, of people who got set up on Linux and returned to Windows because it was a horror show from their perspective.

        Let me give you the clue: “The Year of the Linux Desktop” has been declared with monotonous regularity since the 1990s. It still hasn’t arrived. There’s a reason for this, and the quicker Linux (and other F/OSS) advocates grasp why this is, the quicker will the year actually arrive.

        Until then, Linux is a fringe OS for techies. (And there it excels. As I said, I’ve been a non-stop user of it for ages.)

        • Aggravationstation@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I totally agree that can happen. My first experience with Linux was installing Slackware from a CD I got with a magazine at 16. Install worked but I couldn’t really do much with it with no internet connection so abandoned it. Also I hosed the Windows partition when trying to set up dual boot so got banned from the family PC for a while.

      • slowcurrent@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        All you have to do is turn that off and you can install anything you want. You took a simple problem and made it hard.

        • heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know how this solution should be hard. I always have a live boot usb(O.K. not Fedora) with me and installing these apps is about 1-2 commands and I really don’t like scrolling through legacy Gui apps.

        • scutiger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sounds like they’re talking about the N versions of Windows, which can only install apps through the Microsoft Store. That can be disabled, but my understanding is it’s a pain to get it done. It’s meant to be locked down kind of like Apple products.

      • Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.mlB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My dad thought the XFCE-Materia-Theme is the occasional Windows redesign until i told him.

        And last month he wanted his antivirus back, even though i explained it already. But he’s good at other things.

      • hillosipuli@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is fine line with being tech illiterate and being able to use linux when it all just works. The problems arise only when you are just slightly more advanced and want to do something weird without actually being able do it in linux with some things being a bit too much for the average Joe.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried to install I think Ubuntu for my parents. I failed to find a way to properly allow short/simple passwords after like 2 hours of fiddling with configs. Gave up on it after that.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, its between allowing that and not using Linux at all so that is that. If I could get them to remeber a strong password, it would not be for PC login.

            What distro would you recommend? I was under the impression Ubuntu was furthest with UIs.

            • Clasm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’ve found that OpenSuse Tumbleweed is better than both Ubuntu and Linux Mint.

              They set out to make a distro that is kept up to date perpetually instead of managing different versions.

              • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Hmmm, I had mint for a little bit once. I don’t remember having any issues with it which probably means it is good. Paradoxically it also made me forget about it somewhat.

                But I really have an urge to try NixOS for myself… And I don’t really want to mess with my parents setup now.

  • samsy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    First time I agree with the Raven. Switch to Linux!!! Windows is just a shitshow, we all watch and can’t believe they are doing this. Win 11 will bring us one of the biggest hardware-waste ever in a world where we should spare with resources.

    But hey, throw that 4GB RAM machine in the trash bin everyone wants Win11. So glossy and shiny, so hot right now.

    • Digester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you know what makes windows great? It just works out of the box with broad driver and software compatibility. Extensive hardware support (Windows 10 runs on any brand new hardware as well as old hardware from 12 years ago). Many professional software applications, such as Adobe Creative Cloud, Autodesk products, and Microsoft Office, are primarily developed for Windows. If you rely on specific professional software, Windows offes better compatibility and support.

      Linux offers better security and has a large repository of open source software as well as being very developer friendly. If you’re reading this it’s thanks to Linux. However switching to Linux isn’t a viable option for everyone for the aforementioned points. It surprises me to this day how many smart and tech savvy individuals still can’t grasp this concept.

      • Tekchip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’m going to have to call you on that whole "Windows just works"TM business. I just had to install drivers, during setup, for a regular hard drive in Windows Server 2019. Last time I tried to run the game Rust on Windows 11 it just wouldn’t run and I blew hours and never could find a solution. Had to go back to Win 10 to get it to run. It’s also pretty easy to pay attention to any news feed and see an endless string of Windows is now broken like X on basically a weekly basis at this point. MS Fired their entire QA team and only tests on virtual machines now. Zero surprise Windows breaks in all sorts of new and interesting ways when it finally meets the real world. Anyone who makes this statement is at best naive and at worst a bold face liar/shill. I do try to assume most people are the prior of course.

        That said the rest of your statement is spot on. Right tool for the right job will never not be relevant.

        • Digester@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Printers suck universally, no matter the OS. It’s something everyone can agree on.

          I had the opposite experience, I couldn’t find drivers on Linux for my old Audio Interface (M Audio) from the 2000s but I was able to find an installer for windows on some website and ran just fine on Windows 10. This isn’t even the issue with old tech, if I can’t find drivers (on either OS) for a 15 years old Audio interface, it’s not the end of the world, I just have to accept it. What I find troublesome is sometimes getting modern hardware to work on Linux, especially something that was never designed to work on it.

        • mrmanager@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember Nvidia putting their driver into GeForce Experience just before I stopped using Windows completely. It was taking the driver, adding a user interface on it, stuffed ads inside, required a Nvidia account and ran in the tray all the time. :)

          I assume it still works like that on windows. It’s just filled to the brink with shit like that.

            • mrmanager@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Sure, but it’s the culture of windows. Everything is corporate speak, filled with ads, and taking over the users computer. I got so sick of it all.

              Linux is amazing. It just gets out of the way and provides a fast smooth system that never slows down. Has an excellent fast command line and many great applications handled by a very fast and efficient package manager…I mean, it’s just so much better that it’s no going back.

        • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have literally never had to hunt down some old ass drivers on 90s looking shitty websites on linux

          I spent an hour trying to get my Broadcomm wifi card working on Debian. Gave up…

          Windows is a bit easier, you need to find the right package, but then it’s just one “next next next install” away

              • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are other ways than terminal. I just found it the easiest way to show the list of available drivers in Debian with a single command.

                Also I call bullshit on that “terminal = no”. If people are capable of copy pasting URL they are capable of copying single line of text as well. Even if someone is afraid of terminal it provides a lot less ambiguity and should give it a shot. It doesn’t require navigating through user interface which has tendency to change over time while following someone’s instructions or images which might leave out the step or fail to include where to click, move, open then go to tab, 3rd row down, click open… etc. Besides nothing happens if you make a mistake. World doesn’t end. Computer doesn’t explode.

                • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Windows has been GUI only for end users for 22 years by now…

                  t doesn’t require navigating through user interface

                  Yes because terminal syntax and binaries can’t change either, right?

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Extensive hardware support is not really true. Windows is supported by hardware manufacturers because it’s popular, but Microsoft isn’t the one making drivers. So Windows doesn’t have extensive hardware support since after installing the OS you have to spend time installing drivers which manufacturers made otherwise it’s almost unusable.

        • Digester@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Saying that Windows has driver support means that drivers are supported by the system (because they exist and are available) regardless of the driver’s provider. The entities providing the drivers are essentially what gives Windows support.

          Sure you have to spend time installing drivers just like you would have to spend time installing any type of software on a machine to achieve the operating function you require. I don’t think I fully understand what you’re trying to say here.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are using “support” instead of “capability”. Having capability of installing drivers is pretty much given to any operating system. Said drivers being provided for the operating system in question is a hardware manufacturer thing. Microsoft doesn’t provide support for drivers, they provide capability of installing drivers. Microsoft is not involved in development process of said drivers not do they offer technical support in resolving issues regarding them. The fact Windows is the most popular means most manufacturers will support Windows but that has nothing to do with Microsoft other than charging for that sticker they put on boxes.

            If you buy nVidia card, it’s nVidia that supports Windows, not that Windows supports nVidia. nVidia made the effort to develop and test software on that operating system, is providing technical support for that software, has upgrade paths, etc. Windows is just there and popular.

            • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is completely asinine, you need to read up on your history. Microsoft literally created DirectX in 95 to help developers for software and hardware develop multimedia drivers and applications for windows.

              "In late 1994, Microsoft was ready to release Windows 95, its next operating system. An important factor in the value consumers would place on it was the programs that would be able to run on it. Microsoft employee Alex St. John had been in discussions with various game developers asking how likely they would be to bring their MS-DOS games to Windows 95, and found the responses mostly negative; programmers had found that the Windows environment did not provide the necessary features which were available under MS-DOS using BIOS routines or direct hardware access.[6] There were also strong fears of compatibility; a notable case of this was from Disney’s Animated Storybook: The Lion King which was based on the WinG programming interface.[7] Due to numerous incompatible graphics drivers from new Compaq computers that were not tested with the WinG interface which came bundled with the game, it crashed so frequently on many desktop systems that parents had flooded Disney’s call-in help lines.[8][9]

              St. John recognized the resistances for game development under Windows would be a limitation, and recruited two additional engineers, Craig Eisler and Eric Engstrom, to develop a better solution to get more programmers to develop games for Windows. The project was codenamed the Manhattan Project, like the World War II project of the same name, and the idea was to displace the Japanese-developed video game consoles with personal computers running Microsoft’s operating system.[8] It had initially used the radiation symbol as its logo but Microsoft asked the team to change the logo.[8] Management did not agree to the project as they were already writing off Windows as a gaming platform, but the three committed towards this project’s development.[9] Their rebellious nature led Brad Silverberg, the senior vice president of Microsoft’s office products, to name the trio the “Beastie Boys”.[10] "

              Its also completely foolish to think that the driver engineers from any specific company don’t have a corporate support line to contact if they need help with something or a personal contact they could bounce ideas off of.

      • Cannacheques@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Linux is not more secure really, it’s just assumed to be so because it’s less widely attacked for having less market share

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, you have a user, it cannot mess with another user, by design.

          In windows you can do so many crappy things it’s incredible, like rescue boot and just change the crowd strike executables with a notepad++ exe aaand you are “free!”

          The security holes ae trash too, you can’t deny that. Corporate PCs are plagued with “anti virus” and other scanning softs, sending your every keystroke to some authentication server so see if no malicious intent is detected.

          If you want to do something efficient, Windows is no longer the way IMO.

    • Gorbachof@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole point of an OS is to streamline the process it takes to run your applications. No matter how great it is for you, Linux does not do that for everyone.