“Why Do So Many Music Venues Use Ticketmaster?” “What’s It Like to Train to Be a Sushi Chef?” “How Do Martial Artists Break Concrete Blocks?” If you were looking for answers to such questions 10 years ago, your best resource for finding a thorough, expert-informed response likely would have been one of the most interesting and longest-lasting corners of the internet: Quora.

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you were looking for answers to such questions 10 years ago, your best resource for finding a thorough, expert-informed response likely would have been one of the most interesting and longest-lasting corners of the internet: Quora.

    I disagree, the best place for such answers used to be Reddit, and Stack Exchange for the techy stuff. Quora always felt like cancer for some reason and I never really used it.

    • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Here’s hoping at some point search engines will return Lemmy links when people look for answers, but we’re not there yet

      • Russ@bitforged.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Kagi now has a lens for focusing results from the Fediverse, I’ve seen it pull Lemmy links before!

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        search engines are thoroughly crap right now. Abandon all hope that they will become better.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think that’s because Quora paywalls responses from volunteers, preventing others from seeing them unless they pay a subscription. Pretty scummy.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t call it scummy, just bad business, give people one premium answer per week, so they know the quallity and at incentivised to pay.

        • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do they pay the people who answer the questions? I genuinely don’t know. But if they don’t then, yes, it is scummy to just profit off of someone else’s work and not pay them.

          • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve contributed to sites like Wikipedia.

            Not everything needs to be measured in money though. There’s inherent satisfaction in the work with things like this. And at the end of the day, we all benefit from having platforms with accurate, well thought out answers. Today you’re answering, tomorrow you’re the one with the question.

            • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Wikipedia is run by a nonprofit. They don’t monetise volunteer contributions and they don’t paywall the knowledge on their site, they run on donations. It’s not really a comparable situation.

  • maness300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s so fucking stupid how it it always defaults to “similar questions” instead of just showing us the actual answers.

    Just another example of throwing as much shit at an audience to drive up “engagement.”