More 128TB SSDs are coming as almost no one noticed this launch — another SSD controller that can support up to 128TB appeared paving the way for HDD-beating capacities::Phison quietly revealed an updated X2 SSD platform at CES

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    as almost no one noticed this launch

    That’s because we’re having trouble just getting food. A shiny new and expensive SSD isn’t even on the list at this point.

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      At that size they are certainly targeting enterprise and cloud servers. Cool that they are getting that big, but they probably cost as much as a house.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      These are not intended for you anyways. They are designed for servers.

      It’s still interesting though and server hardware eventually makes it way down to normal people.

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    What’s the biggest HDD out there? I mean at sizes this big it’s a lot of data to lose in one go if it dies. Even if you have backups or whatever that’s a lot to have to restore.

    • littlecolt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I like 8TB drives for media. I know the rules of safe backup say you should have 3 copies, but I just have another 8TB drive for each one that’s in use and I do a sync every few months. The backup drives, when not hooked up to sync for backup, sit safely in anti static bags inside the boxes they came in, in a file cabinet drawer.

        • CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve seen SSDs hit 100TB, but those are $40k+. And more “reasonable” options like 64TB for $10k or so.

          HDDs just reached 30TB, but I don’t think those are widely available yet. 24TB is the biggest you can expect to see for sale.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That’s cool and all, but the only reason I would want that capacity is to store stuff that I would want to store for much longer than a lifespan of an SSD. Only HDD’s have that kind of lifespan. Like a gigantic video library/archive. I guess these aren’t for me.

    But if they drive down the price of high capacity, HDDs, all the better. 

    • ANIMATEK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not for you. It’s for enterprises, but I can drive down the prices of shit you would use. No noise, better performance, less energy; it’s a win-win.

    • falkerie71@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong here, but I remember that SSDs lifespan mainly depends on how much you overwrite the drive. For 128TB, it should take you a very long time to overwrite the entire drive, let alone couple hundred or thousand times to kill the drive. I know that bit rot also happens on SSDs, but that applies to HDDs as well, and good drive maintenance practices should alleviate the issue. Though for archival purposes/cold storage, tape drives are probably better.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The lifespan of your data isn’t nearly as long as the lifespan of the cells storing your data. Due to leakage of of power from the cells, and the more and more dense these cells are being packed (leading to smaller differences between what voltage maps to what binary value), SSDs have issues with bitrot. With a disk this size you would need to have data regularly checked and refreshed (rewritten) to ensure the data being stored was still correct and not corrupted.