• ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you have to run power to it, you might as well run some data as well. Never really the best idea to have mission critical equipment at the mercy of a congested wifi network.

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Save some trouble and go with POE. A little more expense to setup, but you only have to run one wire and everything is permanently hardwired.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m hard pushing my family and friends to replace/install POE switches currently. Its a minor cost upgrade that will make my life so much easier

      • LukyJay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I use hikvision and the quality is great in low light. I haven’t connected them to the internet since I use Frigate and Home Assistant to monitor the feeds.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I put mine on an unconnected network attached to a connected desktop. Videos are written and uploaded to the cloud when motion is detected. ISpy is a good open source video system even if it is written in C#.

      • Clipboards@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        UniFi Protect is outstanding. You need to buy one of their NVRs or cloud gateways to use it, but it’s incredible & wouldn’t want another system for our house/family business

  • IntentionallyAnon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Most likely 2.5g WiFi deauth. 5g fixes it and the companies just put 2.5g chips that are affected by this. Not that hard to use 5g chips.

    Edit: Jamming Jamming is different. At that point use Ethernet

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ten years ago i had a pocket jammer that whacked every consumer radio frequency within 50 feet.

      Not hard to do when you dont care about regs and laws.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    And that’s why hardlining is still by far the best option available.

    1. Hardlined cameras need to be physically accessed and the cables snipped in order to disrupt them, and most cameras offering hardlining now feed Ethernet through their bases, providing additional protection.
    2. Most sub-20 camera systems can run for up to an hour or two on a 500VA UPS, and up to a week or more with PowerWall backups, defeating intentional power outages.
    3. A fully airgapped system can defeat any sort of direct Internet intrusion.
    4. Shielded Ethernet can help protect from crosstalk attacks provided they are correctly grounded with the appropriate switches.
    5. Hardware auth between cameras and the DVR can help defend against direct attacks via an unplugged cable or an open wall jack, in that only approved hardware can make the needed connections with either end.
    6. Encrypted communications between cameras and DVR can enhance the security of data across the wire.
    7. A brace of identical dummy cameras - similarly powered, if they have external indicators - alongside real ones will waste the time and effort of attackers who conduct physical attacks, while keeping recording-infrastructure needs to a minimum.
    8. Bonus if identical but “dark” Ethernet is similarly spoofed throughout the building, as not only will it confuse physical attackers, but it’ll also be already in-place for future communications-infrastructure improvements.
    9. DVR needs to be in a secured location, ideally fireproof. In combination with № 7 and № 8, a dummy DVR (with live screens showing actual content) can exist elsewhere to distract any physical attackers.

    Sure, this list isn’t 100% coverage, but it gets you nearly there with a minimum of effort.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you are in the middle of a frame-off gut of a home, as I currently am, much of this is trivial to implement.

        Even my parent’s 1978 home, with it’s drop ceiling in the basement, would not make most of this all that much more difficult.

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you are in the middle of a frame-off gut of a home, as I currently am, much of this is trivial to implement.

          A notoriously low-effort endeavor in itself.

          “It’s doable with a minimum of effort as long as you have your house gutted down to the foundations” isn’t exactly the shining defense of “a minimum of effort” that I expected to read

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Go in your attic for 20 minutes. Throw some Ethernet around. You don’t even have to plug all of it in lol

            • Drusas@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Not all attics are that accessible. Mine is basically an above-house crawlspace full of insulation such that you need a mask.