Reports were saying the Switch was coming q4 2024, but now Nintendo is reportedly telling its partners that it’s been pushed to q1 2025

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Switch still feels like such a fresh system to me. I’m in no hurry for an upgrade

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it’s 100% backwards compatible, as it should be, I won’t mind upgrading and passing down mine to my young child or perhaps donating it to a children’s hospital.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m ready to quit hearing jealous PlayStation and Xbox owners gripe about the lack of power in the portable they wish was fast enough to subdue their midlife crisis 😅

    • Crystal_Shards64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I feel like it was the past month or two? There’s supposed to be a Nintendo direct soon which might tell us more. Lots of speculation as of now. Only thing that I’ve read is that it won’t have an oled screen

    • force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It says in the post description, it was originally set for Q4 2024 but now it’s going to be in Q1 2025 allegedly

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I noticed there’s now a Batman Arkham Knight port on Switch. As you might expect, like a lot of other AAA ports, it doesn’t run so well. Seems there’s demand for these games on there, indicating a lot of players only end up with one console. Even if Nintendo can work with their low-power devices, I get the impression third party developers will generally need more to get Unreal Engine going smooth.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem developers have is why should they bother with all of the effort of trying to get their game working on the switch when they can just twiddle with it a little bit to make it work on the Steam Deck?

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like how the switch had two Zelda games that are still more mechanically impressive than all the open world games on “better” systems.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        All that proves is Nintendo writes great software.

        It doesn’t make their hardware not criminally underwhelming.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Do you only think the hardware is underwhelming because you’re comparing it to a PlayStation that’s about ten times larger? As a handheld console you can’t deny it was impressive.

        • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Also those games have a lot of typical nintendo stubbornness like not realising they’re still putting the buttons on the wrong way around.

          • force@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Nintendo put the buttons in their order 2 decades before the Xbox even existed, if anything Microsoft is putting buttons on the wrong way around. Unless of course you’re referring to something other than the order of X Y A B.

            • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              After which the entire gaming industry decided Nintendo was silly and put them the other way around.

              Just because they were the first ones, doesn’t mean they did it correctly.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I can’t tell if you’re being serious or not, ngl… if you’re being serious though then why do you suppose that having B be above A and Y be above X is the “correct” way? The way I see it, having A be the interact button seems more natural than having B be the interact button, and the former is how it’s set up on games like BOTW that use Nintendo controllers. Tbh though I actually wish bottom was X, left was A, right was B, and up was Y. An abomination to modern gamers, I’m sure, but it seems the most sensical considering the cultural perception of the symbol X imho.

                Also Xbox isn’t the entire game industry… Playstation doesn’t even use the same symbols, and I can’t think of any relevant consoles which use similar controllers to those 3. The only “official” controllers I can think of that use the Xbox order are ones made for specifically Xbox/Microsoft. I guess also the Sega Dreamcast? But that’s more because Microsoft played a large role in making the Dreamcast, and later based the Xbox heavily off of Sega consoles/controllers, and the button layout just came along with everything else. They didn’t want to conflict with Nintendo and potentially get into legal issues based off of controller button layout, so that was the easiest route.

                That being said, I’m so used to the Xbox controller layout that using Nintendo controllers gives me an aneurysm because Xbox switches the buttons. Any time I emulate a Nintendo game I just use my Xbox One controller and a mod to display the input tips differently. But that’s not anyone’s fault.

    • Crampon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You don’t buy Nintendo for pure computing power. I prefer Nintendo consoles for the portability and game library.

      I also have a pc with a 3070ti for more demanding games. Games that Xboxes and playstations runs like shit anyway.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t understand why it would be preferred over a steam deck, especially if it is at that price point.

        • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          First party software. I buy Nintendo consoles for their ip, not their power. My desktop is where I do most of my gaming, but I have an attachment to Zelda games that I don’t think will ever go away. I still have my official prima guide for links awakening dx. I have a map on the wall of twilight princess’s over world.

          I don’t even like the switch for portability because it feels bulky and uncomfortable. But connected to the dock, I can forget that it’s supposed to be portable and enjoy my Zelda games. My wife also likes animal crossing, and I got her to play her first Zelda and Pokémon games in the last year, and those were games that shaped my childhood.

          So I guess my answer is shared experiences and nostalgia.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    as long as it comes with an unpatchable hardware vuln thast exploitable

    homebrew on switch has been abysmal compared to previous consoles because no ones gonna pay to get their switch mod chipped if they cant just gg ez the system with an sd card.

    hell even the “old” switch exploit isn’t even a coldboot so you need to either keep a trinket/phone/pc around or never shutdown the console.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think I’m going to download all my digital purchases into SD cards and hopefully they’ll still be playable when the OG switch reaches EOL.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was just looking at Switch games in the store this weekend. Even games that came out when Switch launched are still nearly $60. The console is slow and laggy. Nintendos online networks are laughable and cheesy. It’s such a barebones and cruddy system with overpriced games and it never drops in price or popularity. People make no sense to me.

    • ripripripriprip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      First party Nintendo games maintain value forever. This is not exclusive to the switch.

      None of the first party games are slow or laggy.

      Online is nothing special. Splatoon 3 plays great, though.

      First party games and indie games are the only great reasons to own a switch and if you stick to those guns, most everything you said doesn’t hold water.