• r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    This generation of 737 seems cursed. The MCAS scandal (and it was a scandal), just before the new year there were warnings to operators to check for loose nuts and now this.

    Boeing are not having a good time.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There never should have been a “this generation” of 737, at least not how it was designed. It basically should have been an entirely new designation but they kept trying to shoehorn upgrades into it so pilots wouldn’t have to get recertified.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I entirely agree, But I also kinda understand it. Without the new engines they could not compete with the A32x product line. But they wouldn’t fit without the tricks they pulled. It should have been a new airframe designed to take those engines.

        That re-design and certification would take too long though, and they’d lose huge market share to airbus.

        Now, I say I understand their actions, this does not mean I agree with them!

        • Shard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, that’s on Boeing as well. They slacked off in the R&D department for too long and allowed Airbus to one-up them. Then they tried some convoluted way to play catch up and failed epically…

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      They exist solely to increase shareholder value. Planes are just a method for doing so. Now the corner cutting is showing consequences.

    • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s almost like the 737 was obsolete decades ago and Boeing chose to zombify its corpse instead of lay it to rest and develop a better narrow body!

      • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Ironically enough MD covered up a fatal door blowout risk in the DC-10 which killed hundreds of people. We don’t yet know if this current incident was actually caused by a design fault, but the DC-10 door accident definitely was.

  • zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The plane experienced a fuselage failure where the door blew out and was delivered something like two months ago.

    • Kitten_Mittens@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      7 months ago

      This fuselage failure actually happened where a door could be in the future. These locations are called plugs, if an airliner decides to add the door at some point in the future the plug is removed and a door is added in its place. In this instance the plug was more of a cork and popped upon pressurization.

  • Jode@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is what happens when you let the financial dicks push out the engineering dicks. Plain and simple.